Skip to main content

Table 1 The basic characteristic of the included studies

From: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between sarcopenia and myocardial infarction

Author

Country

Age

Study design

Sample

Muscle measurement method

Diagnosis of sarcopenia

Diagnosis criteria for sarcopenia

Diagnostic criteria for heart attack

Heart Attack Classification

Sato 2021 [31]

Japan

72 ± 1/ 65 ± 13

Retrospective case–control study

303

DXA

ASMI

AWGS

Comprehensive clinical diagnosis

Not mentioned

Sato 2020 [30]

Japan

66 ± 13

Observational cohort study

387

DXA

ASMI

AWGS

Comprehensive clinical diagnosis

Not mentioned

Santana 2019 [29]

Brazil

71.6 ± 7.4

Cross-sectional study

99

Muscle mass, HGS measurements made using a digital dynamometer, and the gait speed test

Muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance

Based on muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance

Comprehensive clinical diagnosis

Not mentioned

Xia 2021 [32]

China

62.2 ± 8.4

Prospective cohort study

2432

DXA

ASMI

AWGS

Comprehensive clinical diagnosis

Not mentioned

Chang 2022 [28]

China

 ≥ 20

Cross-sectional study

780,405

Muscle mass, HGS made using a digital dynamometer, the gait speed test

Muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance

Based on muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance

Comprehensive clinical diagnosis

Not mentioned

  1. DXA Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, HGS Hand grip strength, ASMI Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index, AWGS Asian working group for sarcopenia