Skip to main content

Table 3 Means, standard deviations, and mixed ANOVA statistics for primary and secondary outcomes in the intention-to-treat sample

From: Non-pharmacological, psychosocial MAKS-s intervention for people with severe dementia in nursing homes: results of a cluster-randomised trial

Variable

Intervention

(n = 60)

Control

(n = 61)

mixed ANOVAa

M

SD

M

SD

Effect

F ratio

df

p

Partial η2

NPI-NH

 t0

21.58

19.08

25.56

15.99

G

1.66

1

.200

.01

 t6

24.58

16.14

25.34

15.86

T

3.10

1

.081

.03

G x T

2.72

1

.102

.02

QUALIDEM

 t0

78.64

13.87

71.92

14.75

G

6.08

1

.015

.05

 t6

75.26

14.62

70.70

15.51

T

3.50

1

.064

.03

G x T

1.01

1

.317

.01

ADCS-ADL-sev

 t0

12.55

10.30

11.69

8.37

G

0.07

1

.892

.00

 t6

10.83

10.58

11.33

9.25

T

9.37

1

.003

.07

G x T

1.01

1

.316

.01

  1. Note. ANOVA Analysis of variance, G Main effect of group, T Main effect of time, G x T Interaction effect between group and time, t0 baseline data collection, t6 data collection directly after the end of the 6-month intervention period, Intervention MAKS-s intervention group, Control waitlist control group, NPI-NH Total score (frequency x severity) of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory – Nursing Home Version, higher scores indicate more pronounced behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, range: 0–144, QUALIDEM Total score of the QUALIDEM, higher scores indicate better quality of life, range: 0–100, ADCS-ADL-sev Total score of the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory – Severe Impairment Version, higher scores indicate higher capabilities in activities of daily living, range: 0–54
  2. aANOVAs were based on scores that were transformed to normality: square root transformation for NPI-NH and ADCS-ADL-sev), quadratic transformation for QUALIDEM
  3. p-values < .05 are printed in bold; n = 121 (intention-to-treat)