Skip to main content

Table 2 Concepts related to care and support of frail older adults in 2018 and preferences for future, mapped to adapted domains of the SELFIE framework (N = 2314 unique participants)

From: Health and social care of home-dwelling frail older adults in Switzerland: a mixed methods study

 

In 2018% (n)

Future preferences

% (n)

INDIVIDUAL WITH MULTI-MORBIDITY AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT

Needs

 Support matches needs a

93.5% (1947/2083)

 

Social network (‘Sometimes’, ‘often’ or ‘always’) b

 Someone who will take you to the doctor if necessary

61% (1293/2114)

 

 Someone who prepares food for you when you’re not able to

44% (881/1997)

 Someone to help you with your day-to-day work when you’re sick

70% (1408/2014)

 Someone who can give you good advice in difficult situations

76% (1556/2046)

 Someone you can trust or talk to about personal problems

88% (1883/2132)

 Someone who understands your problems

88% (1809/2053)

Use of community servicesc, d, e, j

 Help with the housework

57% (650/1132)

81% (919/1132)

 Care and assistance at home

35% (398/1132)

86% (978/1132)

 Meal service

13% (143/1132)

49% (550/1132)

 Elderly day care centref

4% (41/1132)

6% (62/1132)

 Apartment for older adults

3% (36/1132)

22% (251/1132)

 Short stays in a Nursing home

3% (36/1132)

22% (246/1132)

 Care centre with nighttime services

1% (16/1132)

2% (25/1132)

 Other (e.g., Hospital, cleaning)

14% (157/1132)

3% (37/1132)

 I do not know

 

13% (147/1132)

Transportc, d, e, j

 Transportation and assistance services (e.g., to doctor’s office, shopping)

24% (274/1132)

51% (572/1132)

DOMAIN: WORKFORCE

Informal caregiver supportc, e, j

 Family members of the same age (e.g., spouse, partner)

56% (863/1542)

56% (870/1542)

 Younger family members (e.g., children, grandchildren)

55% (845/1542)

67% (1033/1542)

 Friends and neighbours

23% (350/1542)

30% (454/1542)

Use of health care professionalsd

 Physiotherapy c, e

45% (505/1132)

43% (486/1132)

 GP visitsg

  0 visits

2% (46/2163)

 

  1–6 visits

60% (1307/2163)

  7–10+ visits

37% (810/2163)

 Specialist visitsg

  0 visits

16% (328/2045)

 

  1–6 visits

67% (1376/2045)

  7–10+ visits

17% (341/2045)

  Other medical services (e.g., dentist, eye doctor)

59% (1368/2314)

Use of care organizationsc, h, d, e

 Private help (self-payment)

47% (466/996)

43% (425/996)

 Non-profit aid (e.g., home care support)

42% (417/996)

86% (855/996)

 Pro Senectute (a non-profit foundation serving older adults)

9% (92/996)

26% (261/996)

 Red Cross Baselland

6% (63/996)

10% (100/996)

 Associations i

3% (27/996)

6% (58/996)

 Nursing home

 

23% (227/996)

 Other (e.g., help with cleaning)

20% (195/996)

7% (74/996)

  1. Note. Participants had the opportunity to express their use of health and social care and support across multiple domains. The content domains are not mutually exclusive. Grey boxes indicate that the answer option was not available
  2. aMissing responses = 10%
  3. bMissing responses: a) n = 200, 9% b) n = 317, 14% c) n = 300, 13% d) n = 268, 12% e) n = 182, 8% f), n = 261, 11%
  4. c% of responses = The proportion of the respondents accounted for by this category due to multiple responses possible. To record responses to questions where respondent can give more than one answer
  5. dconsidered to be “Formal care” in this paper
  6. edenominator was restricted to only respondents who answered both questions for current use and future preferences
  7. fday care center (e.g., providing advice, support, care and integration)
  8. gmissing responses – GP: 7%; Specialist: 12%
  9. hmissing responses – 56% who did not respond and/or are not receiving help from an organization
  10. iAssociations: Combined values for Alzheimer’s association, Parkinson’s association and Diabetes association
  11. jolder adults who responded that they did not need support were reported in Additional file 5