STAKEHOLDER GROUP | GENERAL FACTORS | MAIN FACTORS | SUB-FACTORS |
---|---|---|---|
RESIDENT | CHARACTERISTICS | PERSON | Unlike other residents |
BEHAVIOR | Nature of the behavior | ||
Course of the behavior | |||
Severity of the behavior | |||
Unpredictability of the behavior | |||
Unclear triggers of the behavior | |||
Behavior considered as (partly) on purpose | |||
Behavior differs from personality before diagnosis of dementia | |||
INTERACTION ISSUES WITH OTHER (GROUPS OF) STAKEHOLDERS | WITH OTHER RESIDENTS | The resident’s behavior causes inconveniences and danger for the other residents Reactions of other residents negatively affect the resident’s behavior | |
WITH NURSING HOME STAFF | The resident not understanding verbal requests | ||
The resident giving short answers/minimal reaction | |||
The resident not wishing to/not making any contact | |||
Inability of nursing home staff to read the resident’s emotions | |||
Nursing home staff not understanding the resident’s behavior and having no control over the behavior | |||
WITH CARE STAFF SPECIFICALLY | Not noticing signs of escalation of the resident’s behavior in a timely manner | ||
Positive moments with the resident are scarce | |||
Paying attention to the resident takes a lot of time | |||
Undertaking pleasant activities with the resident is problematic | |||
Applying compulsory treatment is difficult | |||
RELATIVE | CHARACTERISTICS | PERCEPTIONS | Having a different perception of the behavior, treatment and care |
Finding it hard to accept that usual care could not always be provided | |||
INTERACTION ISSUES WITH OTHER (GROUPS OF) STAKEHOLDERS | WITH NURSING HOME STAFF | Nursing home staff insufficiently informs/involves relatives | |
Relative has limited trust in (certain) care staff members | |||
Relative criticizes actions of care staff | |||
Relative crosses personal boundaries of care staff members | |||
Relative is ambivalent/uncommunicative about emotions and wishes for treatment | |||
CARE STAFF | CHARACTERISTICS | PERSONALITY ISSUES | Different approaches and interactions with the resident due to different personalities of care team members |
SKILLS ISSUES | Having insufficient knowledge and experience | ||
Reports are of an insufficient quality | |||
Reflects insufficiently on own actions and feelings | |||
ATTITUDE ISSUES | Having a wait-and-see attitude/refraining from taking the initiative | ||
Not asking for help/asking for help too late | |||
Refraining from complying with the behavioral management approach that was agreed on | |||
Having a fatalistic attitude | |||
Differences in views on the behavior, approaches in dealing with the resident’s extreme challenging behavior and experiences of the behavior due to a difference in working shifts (day/night) and number of working hours | |||
Difference in opinions about appropriate care | |||
Difference in the extent to which the resident’s behavior is accepted | |||
INTERACTION ISSUES WITHIN STAKEHOLDER GROUP | WITHIN CARE STAFF | Little opportunity for formal and informal exchange of information | |
Giving each other feedback is difficult | |||
New ideas from care staff members often receive a negative response from other care staff members | |||
Communication takes place indirectly | |||
TREATMENT STAFF | CHARACTERISTICS | BEING AT BAY | Missing the whole picture of the situation and the resident’s behavior |
Only present during office hours | |||
TREATMENT ISSUES | Difficult to develop and implement a treatment plan | ||
Treatment plans have no effect/temporary effect | |||
The situation often needed to end as soon as possible | |||
Difficulties with prescribing medication | |||
SKILLS ISSUES | Having insufficient knowledge and experience | ||
Making treatment plans which are outdated/ impractical/unachievable/not feasible | |||
Unable to detect the needs of the care staff, meet their expectations or support them properly | |||
Involving external expertise too late | |||
ATTITUDE ISSUES | Being indecisive/taking little responsibility | ||
Undertaking too few actions | |||
Not informing themselves properly about the (severity of) the behavior | |||
Unaware of the expertise of care staff | |||
INTERACTION ISSUES WITHIN STAKEHOLDER GROUP | WITHIN TREATMENT STAFF | Different perceptions as to everyone’s responsibilities pertaining to the situation | |
Not enough formal and informal exchange of information between the psychologist and elderly care physician | |||
NURSING HOME STAFF | INTERACTION ISSUES WITHIN STAKEHOLDER GROUP | QUALITY OF INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION | Limited exchange of information due to few meetings |
No room for reflection | |||
No room for giving each other feedback | |||
No room for an extensive analysis of the behavior | |||
Care staff members not communicating their needs, wishes and actions taken with the treatment staff | |||
Care staff members share incomplete and unclear information | |||
Treatment staff members insufficiently involving care staff in their plans | |||
Care and treatment staff not taking each other seriously or not listening to each other’s ideas/rationalizations for approaching the problem | |||
INEFFICIENT WORK PROCESSES | Indirect communication between care and treatment staff Inefficient communication due to a missing working agreement | ||
ORGANIZATION | CHARACTERISTICS | STAFFING ISSUES | Short staffing and staff-turnover |
Excessive workload | |||
UNIT | Size of the unit | ||
ORGANIZATIONAL NORMS | Acceptance of the behavior by considering it as part of the dementia or the resident’s personality | ||
ROLE OF MANAGEMENT | Management staff insufficiently investing in solutions to improve the situation for the resident | ||
Management staff making decisions interfering with the clinical situation |