Evaluating the feasibility of a remote-based training program supported by information and communications technology in the older adults living at home

Table 3 Differences in the changes of each score after intervention

Outcomes	Program	1 month		2 months		3 months
		Means^a (SE)	Difference (95% CI)	Means^a (SE)	Difference (95% CI)	Means^a (SE)	Difference (95% CI)
CS-30	Exercise-Intensive	22.58 (0.91)	0.88 (− 1.77, 3.54) p = 0.510	23.63 (0.93)	− 1.19 (− 3.88, 1.50) p = 0.382	27.30 (0.94)	0.08 (− 2.64, 2.79) p = 0.955
CS-30	Light-load exercise	21.69 (0.97)	0.88 (− 1.77, 3.54) p = 0.510	24.82 (0.98)	− 1.19 (− 3.88, 1.50) p = 0.382	27.22 (0.98)	0.08 (− 2.64, 2.79) p = 0.955
TUG	Exercise-Intensive	6.14 (0.18)	− 1.19 (− 3.88, 1.50) p = 0.382	5.82 (0.17)	0.10 (− 0.51, 0.70) p = 0.750	5.40 (0.17)	0.00 (− 0.49, 0.49) p = 0.989
TUG	Light-load exercise	6.11 (0.19)	− 1.19 (− 3.88, 1.50) p = 0.382	5.72 (0.22)	0.10 (− 0.51, 0.70) p = 0.750	5.40 (0.17)	0.00 (− 0.49, 0.49) p = 0.989
SOLEO	Exercise-Intensive	94.35 (4.47)	− 1.90 (− 15.01, 11.20) p = 0.774	96.48 (4.58)	− 8.91 (− 22.19, 4.38) p = 0.187	98.99 (4.77)	− 7.68 (− 21.21, 5.84) p = 0.263
SOLEO	Light-load exercise	96.26 (4.74)	− 1.90 (− 15.01, 11.20) p = 0.774	105.39 (4.78)	− 8.91 (− 22.19, 4.38) p = 0.187	106.67 (4.79)	− 7.68 (− 21.21, 5.84) p = 0.263

Exercise-Intensive Exercise-Intensive program, Light-load exercise Light-load exercise program, CS-30 30-s chair-stand test, TUG Timed Up and Go test, SOLEO Standing on one leg with eyes open test, SE Standard error, CI Confidence interval
^aAll means were least-square means after controlling covariates (baseline value, age, and sex)

ISSN: 1471-2318