Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of participants in PEERS trial

From: Evaluating the feasibility of a remote-based training program supported by information and communications technology in the older adults living at home

 

Exercise-Intensive program n = 36

Light-load exercise program n = 34

P value

Sex, n (%)

  

0.989

 Male

19 (52.8)

18 (52.9)

 

 Female

17 (47.2)

16 (47.1)

 

Age, years, mean (SD)

69.3 (3.9)

68.8 (3.1)

0.568

BMI, kg/m2 mean (SD)

22.2 (2.9)

23.1 (2.8)

0.182

Brief Frailty Index, N (%)

  

0.088

 0 points

16 (44.4)

12 (35.3)

 

 1 point

9 (25.0)

16 (47.1)

 

 2 points

7 (15.4)

6 (17.7)

 

 3 points

4 (11.1)

0 (0.0)

 

Fall Risk Index N (%)

  

0.244

 0 points

18 (50.0)

10 (29.4)

 

 2 points

7 (19.4)

12 (35.3)

 

 4 points

6 (16.7)

5 (14.7)

 

 5 points

4 (11.1)

7 (20.6)

 

 6 points

1 (2.8)

0 (0.0)

 

Self-rated health status, N (%)

  

0.788

 Good

5 (18.5)

3 (10.3)

 

 Moderate

7 (25.9)

7 (24.1)

 

 Average

14 (51.9)

17 (58.6)

 

 Not very good

1 (3.7)

2 (6.9)

 

 Poor

0

0

 

CS-30, mean (SD)

16.83 (5.34)

18.10 (4.80)

0.320

TUG, mean (SD)

7.59 (2.07)

7.26 (1.98)

0.508

SOLEO, median (range)a

118.6 (2.4–120.0)

60.7 (6.2–120.0)

0.051

  1. CS-30 30-s chair-stand test, TUG Time Up and Go, SOLEO Standing on one leg with eyes open test, SD Standard deviation, BMI Body mass index
  2. aMann–Whitney test was used for the comparison of SOLEO