Skip to main content

Table 1 Critical appraisal results for included studies using the JBI-Qualitative Critical Appraisal Checklist

From: Perspectives of older adults, caregivers, healthcare providers on frailty screening in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Citation

Shaw, R. L. et al. [34]

Boland, M. et al. [54]

C Ambagtsheer, R. et al. [30]

Mulla, E., et al. [55]

Archibald, M. M. et al. [53]

Van Damme, J. et al. [29]

Q1a

U

U

U

U

Y

U

Q2b

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Q3c

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Q4d

Y

U

Y

Y

U

Y

Q5e

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Q6f

N

N

N

Y

N

Y

Q7g

Y

Y

U

Y

U

U

Q8h

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Q9i

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Q10j

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Score

8

7

7

9

7

8

  1. aIs there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
  2. bIs there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
  3. cIs there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
  4. dIs there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
  5. eIs there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
  6. fIs there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
  7. gIs the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
  8. hAre participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
  9. iIs the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
  10. jDo the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Back to article page

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us