Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the participants in the two groups

From: Positive effects on activities of daily living one year after receiving comprehensive geriatric assessment – results from the randomised controlled study CGA-Swed

 

Control (n = 77)

Intervention (n = 78)

p-value

Age, mean (range)

86.2 (76–98)

87.5 (75–101)

0.17

Female % (n)

55.8 (43)

60.3 (47)

0.58

Living alone % (n)

62.3 (48)

65.4 (51)

0.70

Living in nursing home % (n)

6.5 (5)

9.0 (7)

0.27

Dependent in IADL % (n)

90.9 (70)

93.6 (73)

0.53

Dependent in PADL 2 weeks before admission % (n)

39.0 (30)

47.4 (37)

0.29

Dependent in PADL at baseline % (n)

68.8 (53)

76.9 (60)

0.26

Good self-rated healtha% (n)

27.3 (21)

33.3 (26)

0.41

Non-frail % (n)

0

0

 

Pre-frail % (n)

7.8 (6)

3.8 (3)

 

Frail % (n)

92.2 (71)

96.2 (75)

0.332

CIRS-G ≥ 3 in any category, % (n)b

93.5 (72)

98.7 (77)

0.26

CIRS-G, median number of ratings 3–4 (range)

3 (0–9)

3 (0–7)

 
  1. a Excellent, very good, or good
  2. 2 Fischer’s exact test (too few numbers in one cell for chi-square)
  3. b Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics [28]. Rating 3 = severe/constant significant disability/uncontrollable chronic problem and rating 4 = extremely severe/immediate treatment required/end-organ failure/severe impairment in function