Skip to main content

Table 5 Modification of the Effect of Loneliness on Frailty by Living Arrangement

From: Living arrangement modifies the associations of loneliness with adverse health outcomes in older adults: evidence from the CLHLS

 

No Loneliness

Loneliness

Odds Ratio (95% CI) for the Association Between Loneliness and Frailty Within Each Stratum of Living Arrangement

 

N With/Without

Frailty

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

N With/Without Frailty

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Cross-sectional Analyses a

    

Total Sample c

1770/7396

1.0 (reference)

1444/3128

1.40 (1.25–1.56)

P < 0.001

–

NLA

1633/6420

1.0 (reference)

1215/2146

1.39 (1.24–1.57)

P < 0.001

1.39 (1.24–1.57)

P < 0.001

LA

137/976

0.47 (0.37–0.60)

P < 0.001

229/982

0.66 (0.53–0.81)

P < 0.001

1.42 (1.07–1.90)

P = 0.017

Longitudinal Analyses b

    

Total Sample c

1110/3730

1.0 (reference)

493/1241

1.20 (0.99–1.46)

P = 0.067

–

NLA

970/3282

1.0 (reference)

346/816

1.21 (0.97–1.51)

P = 0.090

1.20 (0.96–1.50)

P = 0.103

LA

140/448

0.85 (0.60–1.21)

P = 0.373

147/425

0.99 (0.70–1.41)

P = 0.969

1.08 (0.73–1.60)

P = 0.715

  1. Note. NLA, not living alone; LA, living alone
  2. a Measure of effect modification on multiplicative scale: OR (95% CI) = 1.00 (0.74–1.36), P = 0.989. Adjusted for age, gender, race, marital status, residence, occupation, education, BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, living preference, socioeconomic status, dietary habits, social/leisure activity score, physical exercise, comorbidities (≥2). Poor self-rated health, poor interviewer-rated health, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, serious illness in the past 2 years, hearing problem, visual impairment, cognitive impairment, and functional limitation were not adjusted as they were included in the calculation of FI score
  3. b Measure of effect modification on multiplicative scale: OR (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.61–1.51), P = 0.863. For 10,524 participants without frailty at baseline. Adjusted for age, gender, race, occupation, education, and changes in marital status, residence, BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, socioeconomic status, dietary habits, social/leisure activity score, physical exercise, and comorbidity number from 2008/2009 to 2011/2012
  4. c Living arrangements were also adjusted