Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of population in precarious and non-precarious caregivers (n = 111)

From: The relationship between social deprivation and a frailty index of cumulative deficits in French middle-aged caregivers

Variables

N. of data available

Whole population (n = 111)

Non-precarious caregivers (n = 70) (a)

Precarious caregivers (n = 20) (a)

p

Sociodemographic characteristics

 Age (years)

111

59 [9]

60 [8]

55 [11.5]

0.021

 Female gender

111

87 (78.4)

56 (80)

13 (65)

0.23

 Educational level:

111

   

<  10−3

  Primary

 

19 (17.1)

8 (11.4)

8 (40)

 

  Secondary

 

25 (22.5)

13 (18.6)

7 (35)

 

  Tertiary

 

67 (60.4)

49 (70)

5 (25)

 

 Professional situation:

111

   

<  10−3

  Active

 

69 (62.2)

42 (60)

13 (65)

 

  Inactive

 

12 (10.8)

4 (5.7)

7 (35)

 

  Retired

 

30 (27)

24 (34.3)

0 (0)

 

 Socio-professional category (current or past):

110

   

0.024

  High profession

 

31 (28.2)

22 (31.4)

2 (10)

 

  Intermediate profession

 

71 (64.6)

44 (62.9)

15 (75)

 

  Trader, craftsman or farmer

 

4 (3.6)

3 (4.3)

0 (0)

 

  Worker

 

4 (3.6)

1 (1.4)

3 (15)

 

 Civil status:

    

<  10−3

  Couple

110

71 (64.6)

52 (74.3)

6 (30)

 

  Single

110

39 (35.5)

18 (25.7)

14 (70)

 

 Financial difficulties for needs (food, rent or charges)

106

16 (15.1)

4 (5.7)

10 (50)

<  10−3

 Homeowner

108

88 (81.5)

68 (97.1)

5 (25)

<  10−9

 Leisure within the year (sport, show or vacation)

110

101 (91.8)

70 (100)

11 (55)

<  10−6

 Epices score (a)

90

9.8 [25.7]

6.8 [11.8]

48.5 [15.2]

<  10−9

Caregiving characteristics

 Relationship to care recipient

101

   

0.174

  Parent

 

72 (71.3)

43 (65.2)

16 (84.2)

 

  Child

 

10 (9.9)

9 (13.6)

0 (0)

 

  Spouse

 

7 (6.9)

4 (6.1)

2 (10.5)

 

  Other

 

12 (11.9)

10 (15.2)

1 (5.3)

 

 Care recipient with neurological disease

100

59 (59)

33 (50.8)

15 (79)

0.036

CRA questionnaire scores for the five dimensions:

 Caregiver’s self-esteem problems

60

18 [6]

18 [5.5]

14.5 [8]

0.62

 Lack of family support

58

13.5 [8]

11.5 [6.8]

17 [7]

0.050

 Financial problems

56

7 [5]

6 [2.5]

8.5 [4]

0.06

 Disrupted schedule

60

15 [8]

12.5 [7.8]

15 [7.3]

0.09

 Health problems

58

10 [4.8]

10 [4.5]

9.5 [6.8]

0.57

Health characteristics

 Frailty index

111

0.22 ± 0.08

0.21 ± 0.07

0.26 ± 0.11

0.015

 Frailty index in class:

111

   

0.007

  Not frail

 

68 (61.3)

49 (70)

7 (35)

 

  Frail

 

40 (36)

20 (28.6)

11 (55)

 

  Severely frail

 

3 (2.7)

1 (1.4)

2 (10)

 

 Perceived health VAS

110

75 [10]

75 [10]

60 [22.5]

0.001

 Financial assistance for long-term illness

100

21 (21)

12 (18.2)

6 (31.6)

0.22

 Smoking status:

110

   

0.005

  Never smoker

 

53 (48.2)

38 (54.3)

5 (25)

 

  Former smoker

 

46 (41.8)

28 (40)

9 (45)

 

  Current smoker

 

11 (10)

4 (5.7)

6 (30)

 

 AUDIT questionnaire for alcohol misuse:

105

   

0.55

  No misuse

 

97 (92.4)

63 (94)

18 (90)

 

  Harmful drinking

 

5 (4.8)

3 (4.5)

1 (5)

 

  Alcohol dependence

 

3 (2.9)

1 (1.5)

1 (5)

 

 General practitioner consulted within the year

110

109 (99.1)

69 (98.6)

20 (100)

> 0.99

 Mammography screening within two years

81

68 (84)

47 (87)

7 (63.6)

0.08

 Cervical smear screening within three years

80

60 (75)

42 (79.3)

7 (58.3)

0.15

 Colorectal cancer screening within two years

95

40 (42.1)

25 (41)

10 (58.8)

0.27

  1. CRA Caregiver Reaction Assessment, VAS Visual Analog Scale, AUDIT Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
  2. a Epices score was available in 90/111 individuals, allowing to define 70 non-precarious and 20 precarious caregivers. Quantitative variables are described using mean ± standard deviation, or median [interquartile range] in case of non-normality and qualitative variables are described using number (percentage)