| |
Vigorous level of physical activitya
|
Moderate level of physical activityb
|
Walk/bike activityc
|
Vigorous fitness/leisured
|
Moderate fitness/leisuree
|
|---|
|
Vegetable intake
|
|
0–4
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
|
5
|
1.01(0.78–1.29)
|
1.10(0.97–1.26)
|
1.57***(1.32–1.86)
|
0.05***(0.04–0.07)
|
0.30***(0.26–0.36)
|
|
6–9
|
1.01(0.77–1.32)
|
1.08(0.94–1.24)
|
1.38***(1.15–1.65)
|
0.04***(0.03–0.06)
|
0.32***(0.27–0.37)
|
|
10
|
1.67***(1.30–2.13)
|
1.51***(1.32–1.72)
|
1.98***(1.65–2.37)
|
0.05***(0.04–0.07)
|
0.30***(0.25–0.35)
|
|
≥ 11
|
3.75***(2.89–4.87)
|
3.14***(2.57–3.84)
|
1.96***(1.54–2.49)
|
0.01***(0.01–0.03)
|
0.15***(0.12–0.20)
|
|
Age group (years)
|
|
60–69
| | | | |
1 [Reference]
|
|
≥ 70
| | | | |
0.42***(0.37–0.47)
|
|
Marital status
|
|
Never married
|
1 [Reference]
| |
1 [Reference]
| | |
|
Currently married
|
0.13***(0.11–0.15)
| |
1.19*(1.00–1.42)
| | |
|
Cohabiting
|
0.15**(0.02–0.90)
| |
1.03(0.27–3.98)
| | |
|
Separated/divorced
|
0.08***(0.04–0.17)
| |
1.76**(1.05–2.96)
| | |
|
Widowed
|
0.08***(0.06–0.10)
| |
0.98(0.79–1.20)
| | |
|
Ever schooled
|
|
No
| | |
1 [Reference]
| | |
|
Yes
| | |
0.95(0.83–1.08)
| | |
|
Ethnicity
|
|
Han majority
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
|
|
Ethnic minority
|
0.56(0.26–1.22)
|
0.55**(0.33–0.92)
|
0.70(0.40–1.20)
|
0.11***(0.03–0.38)
|
0.56(0.26–1.22)
|
|
Always lived in this village/town/city
|
|
No
| |
1 [Reference]
|
1 [Reference]
| | |
|
Yes
| |
0.74***(0.67–0.82)
|
0.96(0.85–1.09)
| | |
|
Fruit intake
|
|
0
| | |
1 [Reference]
| | |
|
1
| | |
1.41***(1.15–1.74)
| | |
|
2
| | |
1.53***(1.29–1.82)
| | |
|
3
| | |
1.33***(1.08–1.63)
| | |
|
≥ 4
| | |
1.25**(1.04–1.50)
| | |
|
Poor SRH
|
|
No
| |
1 [Reference]
| | | |
|
Yes
| |
1.01(0.89–1.15)
| | | |
- Note: ***, ** and * indicates 1, 5 and 10% significance level, respectively
-
AOR adjusted odds ratio
-
aAge group, gender, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, fruit intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
-
bAge group, gender, marital status, ever schooled, and fruit intake were screened out as the confounding variables
-
cAge group, gender, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
-
dAge group, gender, marital status, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, fruit intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
-
eGender, marital status, ever schooled, always lived in this village/town/city, fruit intake, and poor SRH were screened out as the confounding variables
