Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the selected studies

From: Annual incidence of osteoporotic hip fractures in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ID

Author name

Year

Province

Mean age

Number of hip fractures

Measure

Standardized

Crude Rate (per 100,000 person)

Standardized rate (per 100,000 person)

1

Ghafoori et.al.

2014

Tehran

54.2 ± 11.5

23

Incidence rate

–

252 in pooled sex per 100,000 person-year

–

2

Moayyeri et.al.

2004

Multi-Province

–

450

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 2000

84.37 in men

113.03 in menb

103.24 in women

137.83 in womenb

3

Abolhassani et.al. a

2006

Multi-Province

59.9 ± 20.7 in men

70.2 ± 15.3 in women

450

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 2000

84.37 in men

113.03 in menb

103.24 in women

137.83 in womenb

4

Moayyeri et.al. a

2006

Multi-Province

–

450

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 2000

84.37 in men and

113.165 in men

103.24 in women

138.31 in women

5

Maharlouei et.al.

2017

Fars

74.9 ± 11.9 in men

76.7 ± 10.4 in women

605

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 2000

–

66.51 in men

92.37 in women

6

Soveid et.al

2005

Fars

74.2 ± 9.2 in men

74.29 ± 9.2 in women

1833

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 1989

71.28 in Men

128.2 in men

112.72 in Women

182.7 in women

7

Valizadeh et.al.

2008

Zanjan

72.0 ± 10.6 in men

76.0 ± 11.4 in women

244

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 2000

190.9 in Men

206.5 in men

160.3 in Women

214.8 in women

8

Asgarzadeh et.al.

2008

East Azarbaijan

75.0

779

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 2000

176 in Men

200.07 in menb

174 in Women

190 in womenb

9

Beyranvand et.al.

2009

Kermanshah

71.4 ± 11.9 in men

73.5 ± 9.9 in women

161

Cumulative incidence

U.S. population 2000

125.13 in Men

165.77 in men b

109.57 in Women

153.51 in womenb

  1. a The Iranian Multicenter Study on Accidental Injuries (IMSAI) dataset was used in these two studies as the same as Moayyeri et.al. [16]. Consequently, these studies have not been included in the meta-analysis
  2. b Standardized rates were calculated using article information