Skip to main content

Table 3 Responses and test-retest reliability for the near-falls circumstances questions, including the location and direction off the near-fall, the activity preceding the near-fall and how the near-fall occurred

From: Development of a Parkinson’s disease specific falls questionnaire

Near-Falls Questions

Online Version (n = 30)

Paper Version (n = 16)

Combined Versions (n = 46)

Test

Retest

Test-retest reliability

Test

Retest

Test-retest reliability

Test

Retest

Test-retest reliability

Kappa

SE

Kappa

SE

Kappa

SE

Have you experienced a near-fall in the past 12-months? n (%)

30 (100%)

30 (100%)

16 (100%)

16 (100%)

46 (100%)

46 (100%)

Number of near-falls in the past 12-months; median (IQR)

3 (2–3)

3 (2–3)

0.44

0.12

3 (2–3)

2 (2–3)

0.58

0.17

3 (2–3)

2 (2–3)

0.51

0.11

Location of near-falls in the past 12-months; n (%)

 Indoor

4 (13%)

4 (13%)

1.00

0.14

1 (6%)

1 (6%)

1.00

0.31

5 (11%)

5 (11%)

1.00

0.12

 Outdoor

6 (20%)

6 (20%)

1 (6%)

1 (6%)

7 (15%)

7 (15%)

 Both

20 (67%)

20 (67%)

14 (88%)

14 (88%)

34 (74%)

34 (74%)

Number of indoor near-falls in the past 12-months; median (IQR)

3 (2–3)

2 (2–2)

0.44

0.12

2 (2–3)

2 (2–2)

0.53

0.16

2.5 (2–3)

2 (2–3)

0.47

0.09

Number of outdoor near-falls in the past 12-months; median (IQR)

3 (2–3)

3 (2–3)

0.56

0.14

3 (2–3)

3 (2.5–3)

0.56

0.16

3 (2–3)

3 (2–3)

0.56

0.10

Most recent near-falls circumstances; n (%)

Near fall 1: How the near-fall occurred?

  Tripped

21 (70%)

20 (67%)

0.41

0.14

10 (63%)

9 (56%)

0.77

0.19

31 (67%)

29 (63%)

0.56

0.11

  Slipped

7 (23%)

8 (27%)

4 (25%)

5 (31%)

11 (24%)

13 (28%)

  FoG

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

1 (6%)

1 (6%)

2 (4%)

2 (4%)

  Fainted

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

1 (6%)

1 (6%)

2 (4%)

2 (4%)

Near fall 2: How the near-fall occurred?

  Tripped

13 (43%)

16 (53%)

0.66

0.14

7 (44%)

8 (50%)

0.33

0.22

20 (44%)

24 (52%)

0.56

0.12

  Slipped

13 (43%)

12 (40%)

9 (56%)

7 (44%)

22 (47%)

19 (41%)

  FoG

4 (13%)

2 (7%)

0 (0%)

1 (6%)

4 (9%)

3 (7%)

  Fainted

0

0

0

0

0

0

Near fall 1: What activities you were doing?

  Transitioning a

16 (53%)

17 (57%)

0.59

0.15

11 (69%)

12 (75%)

0.75

0.21

27 (59%)

29 (64%)

0.65

0.12

  Walking

7 (23%)

9 (30%)

2 (12%)

2 (12%)

9 (20%)

11 (24%)

  Turning/ Bending over

5 (17%)

2 (7%)

2 (12%)

1 (6%)

7 (15%)

3 (6%)

  Missing b

2 (7%)

2 (7%)

1 (6%)

1 (6%)

3 (6%)

3 (6%)

Near fall 2: What activities you were doing?

  Transitioning a

7 (23%)

7 (23%)

0.78

0.18

5 (31%)

5 (31%)

0.79

0.26

12 (26%)

12 (26%)

0.79

0.14

  Walking

9 (30%)

7 (23%)

2 (12%)

2 (12%)

11 (24%)

9 (20%)

  Turning/ Bending over

7 (23%)

4 (13%)

8 (50%)

3 (19%)

15 (33%)

7 (15%)

  Missing b

7 (23%)

12 (40%)

1 (6%)

6 (38%)

8 (17%)

18 (39%)

Near fal1 l: Which direction did you nearly fall?

  Forwards

14 (47%)

14 (47%)

0.51

0.14

9 (56%)

7 (44%)

0.48

0.17

23 (50%)

21 (46%)

0.54

0.11

  Backwards

7 (23%)

12 (40%)

4 (25%)

6 (38%)

11 (24%)

18 (39%)

  Side (Left)

4 (13%)

3 (10%)

2 (13%)

2 (13%)

6 (13%)

5 (11%)

  Side (Right)

2 (7%)

1 (3%)

1 (6%)

1 (6%)

3 (6%)

2 (4%)

  Missing b

3 (10%)

3 (6%)

Near fall 2: Which direction did you nearly fall?

  Forwards

15 (50%)

13 (43%)

0.46

0.13

8 (50%)

7 (44%)

0.38

0.16

23 (50%)

20 (44%)

0.43

0.10

  Backwards

11 (37%)

9 (30%)

7 (44%)

4 (24%)

18 (39%)

13 (28%)

  Side (Left)

1 (3%)

4 (13%)

0 (0%)

3 (19%)

1 (2%)

7 (15%)

  Side (Right)

2 (7%)

3 (10%)

1 (6%)

2 (13%)

3 (6%)

5 (11%)

  Missing b

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

1 (2%)

1 (2%)

  1. Values are presented as number and percentage (n[%]) for nominal, or median and interquartile range (IQR) for ordinal questions, with κ and SE of κ results for each question provided
  2. FoG freezing of gait. Only data for the participants’ two most recent falls were included
  3. aTransitioning includes getting up from chair/bed/car
  4. bData was entered as missing if participants provided an answer of “do not remember”, or if they did not provide any response