Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariable and multivariable LMM between general practice characteristics and daily functioning

From: Impact of organizational context on patient outcomes in a proactive primary care program:a longitudinal observational study

 

Daily functioning

Crude estimates

Adjusted estimates

Î’

SE

CI (95%)

P value

β

SE

CI (95%)

P value

SES score

−.62

.14

−.88--.35

<.001

 

Health centre

1.04

.20

.65-1.44

<.001

 

1 FTE GP on population ratio

−.002

0.001

−.003- 000

.02

 

1 FTE PN on population ratio

.000

.000

−.001-000

0.01

 

Om U implemented

 3 years vs. 9 years

.23

.37

−.41-1.06

.39

 

 4 years vs. 9 years

−.74

.31

−1.35- -.13

.02

 

Professional who delivered the intervention

 District nurse vs. practice nurse

82

.21

.42- 1.22

<.001

2.19

.59

1.03-3.36

<.001

Age of screening

 75 years vs. 60 years

−.29

.20

−.69-.10

.15

 
  1. Notes: SES= socio-economic status, FTE= full-time equivalent employment. P < .05, __ P < .01, ___ P < .001. Adjusted estimates adjusted for age, sex, education, polypharmacy and hours of district nursing per week. No significant adjusted estimates were found for the following contextual factors; SES score, health centre, FTE GPs population ratio, FTE PNs population ratio, U-PROFIT implemented, age of screening