Skip to main content

Table 3 Hazard ratios of the risk of locomotive syndrome according to Side-step test (agility) fitness level

From: Association of physical fitness and motor ability at young age with locomotive syndrome risk in middle-aged and older men: J-Fit+ Study

  

LS-risk

Unadjusted model

Adjusted model

  

group

(Model 1)

(Model 2)

(Model 3)

(Model 4)

 

All

n (%)

HR (95% CI)

P- value

HR (95% CI)

P- value

HR (95% CI)

P- value

HR (95% CI)

P- value

Side-step test, point (agility)

 

31 (13.4%)

        

 Low ≤50

90

18 (20.0%)

1.00 (Reference)

 

1.00 (Reference)

 

1.00 (Reference)

 

1.00 (Reference)

 

 51 ≤ Medium ≤53

80

9 (11.3%)

0.71 (0.315–1.591)

0.403

0.66 (0.289–1.502)

0.321

0.58 (0.239–1.391)

0.221

0.57 (0.238–1.385)

0.217

 High ≥54

61

4 (6.6%)

0.45 (0.151–1.337)

0.150

0.43 (0.142–1.272)

0.126

0.32 (0.102–0.986)

0.047

0.32 (0.101–0.983)

0.047

  1. Model 1 was the unadjusted model
  2. Model 2 included Model 1 plus age (continuous variable) at university (at the baseline) was adjusted as covariates
  3. Model 3 included Model 1 plus age (continuous variable), and body mass index (low, medium, high) at the follow-up survey were entered as adjusted factors
  4. Model 4 included Model 3 plus the daily step counts at the follow-up survey, steps/day, is entered as adjusted factor
  5. HR hazard ratios, CI confidence interval. The data are presented as the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI])