Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the NLS group and LS-risk group on physical fitness tests and motor ability tests

From: Association of physical fitness and motor ability at young age with locomotive syndrome risk in middle-aged and older men: J-Fit+ Study

 

All (n = 231)

NLS risk group (n = 200)

LS-risk group (n = 31)

t-test

P-valuea

ANCOVA

P-valueb

Physical fitness tests

 Side-step test, point

51.19 (4.2)

51.37 (4.3)

50.10 (3.2)

0.114

0.133

 Vertical jump test, cm

63.84 (6.6)

63.71 (6.7)

64.74 (6.1)

0.420

0.337

 Back muscle strength, kg

171.96 (30.2)

171.69 (30.2)

173.71 (30.5)

0.729

0.520

 Grip strength, kg

51.42 (6.3)

51.34 (6.1)

51.97 (7.1)

0.604

0.617

 Trunk lift, cm

59.22 (7.2)

59.11 (6.9)

59.97 (9.2)

0.538

0.713

 Standing trunk flexion, cm

14.61 (5.6)

14.42 (5.6)

15.90 (5.8)

0.171

0.211

 Step-testc

73.37 (14.4)

73.83 (14.0)

70.43 (16.4)

0.222

0.250

 Physical fitness scores, point

28.13 (2.1)

28.13 (2.1)

28.13 (1.9)

0.992

0.900

Motor ability tests

 50-m run, s

7.07 (0.3)

7.07 (0.3)

7.03 (0.3)

0.534

0.434

 1500-m run, s

331.37 (31.8)

331.45 (32.4)

330.90 (28.5)

0.930

0.839

 Running long jump, cm

528.99 (43.5)

528.88 (43.4)

529.71 (44.3)

0.921

0.795

 Hand-ball throw, m

31.45 (4.1)

31.31 (4.0)

32.32 (4.5)

0.199

0.211

 Pull-up, point

14.33 (5.4)

14.37 (5.5)

14.10 (4.7)

0.795

0.826

 Motor ability scores, point

63.90 (12.2)

63.74 (12.2)

64.97 (12.4)

0.602

0.505

  1. The data are presented as the mean value (standard deviation)
  2. NLS answered “disagree” to all seven items on “Loco-check”, LS locomotive syndrome, LS “agree” to one or more items on “Loco-check”
  3. ANCOVA: analysis of covariance
  4. a P value of independent-samples t-test. bAge-adjusted at follow-up survey. c Step-test scored using the index derived from the formula shown in Additional file 1