Skip to main content

Table 2 Hierarchical linear regression analysis of GOHAI scores associated with physical function, dental status, oral hygiene and oral function

From: Dysphagia and masticatory performance as a mediator of the xerostomia to quality of life relation in the older population

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

β (95 % CI)

β (95 % CI)

β (95 % CI)

β (95 % CI)

Frailty

 Pre-frailty vs. robust

-2.23 (-3.27, -1.19)

-2.13 (-3.16, -1.10)

-2.08 (-3.18, -0.98)

-1.38 (-2.46, -0.29)

 Frailty vs. robust

-2.90 (-6.47, 0.67)

-2.84 (-6.38, 0.70)

-3.17 (-6.89, 0.55)

-2.83 (-6.44, 0.79)

Sarcopenia

-3.88 (-5.92, -1.84)

-3.82 (-5.84, -1.79)

-3.42 (-5.66, -1.17)

-2.59 (-4.78, -0.40)

Removable denture (yes)

-

0.29 (-0.85, 1.43)

0.25 (-0.90, 1.40)

0.52 (-0.68, 1.72)

Functional teeth

(<20 teeth)

 

-2.21 (-3.40, -1.03)

-2.39 (-3.65, -1.14)

-1.87 (-3.26, -0.49)

PI

  

0.20 (-0.65, 1.05)

0.18 (-0.65, 1.02)

Tongue coating

  

0.06 (-0.07, 0.20)

0.04 (-0.10, 0.17)

Xerostomia

   

-3.93 (-5.36, -2.50)

Dysphagia

   

-2.78 (-4.08, -1.48)

Occlusal condition

 B vs. A

   

-0.74 (-1.83, 0.34)

 C vs. A

   

0.92 (-1.32, 3.16)

Masticatory

 Moderate vs. good

   

-0.70 (-1.64, 0.25)

 Poor vs. good

   

-1.06 (-2.42, 0.03)

  1. PI Plaque index
  2. Model 1: This model included demographic factors, frailty and sarcopenia.
  3. Model 2: This model included demographic factors, frailty, sarcopenia, removable denture and functional teeth.
  4. Model 3: This model included demographic factors, frailty, sarcopenia, removable denture, functional teeth, plaque index and tongue coating.
  5. Model 4: This model included demographic factors, frailty, sarcopenia, removable denture, functional teeth, plaque index, tongue coating, xerostomia, dysphagia, occlusal condition and masticatory performance.