Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariable Cox proportional hazardous regression model for overall survival and cancer-specific survival

From: Comparison of survival in elderly patients treated with uretero-cutaneostomy or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy

Characteristics

Hazard Ratio [95% CI]

p

Overall Survival

Urinary Diversion

 Ileal Conduit

1 [Reference]

 

 Uretero-cutaneostomy

1.044 [0.867–1.257]

0.651

Age

1.067 [1.032–1.103]

< 0.001

Sex

 Female

1 [Reference]

 

 Male

0.857 [0.521–1.411]

0.545

Marital Status

 Married

1 [Reference]

 

 Single

1.018 [0.828–1.251]

0.867

 Unknown

1.039 [0.593–1.822]

0.894

Year of Diagnosis

 2004 ~ 2010

1 [Reference]

 

 2011 ~ 2016

0.923 [0.700–1.217]

0.569

Race/Ethnicity

 White

1 [Reference]

 

 Black

0.894 [0.555–1.440]

0.644

 Asian

0.911 [0.574–1.445]

0.692

Insurance

 Insured

1 [Reference]

 

 Uninsured

1.136 [0.156–8.259]

0.900

 Unknown

1.005 [0.814–1.241]

0.963

Tumor Grade

 Urothelial Carcinoma, Low Grade

1 [Reference]

 

 Urothelial Carcinoma, High Grade

1.228 [0.777–1.941]

0.379

 Urothelial Carcinoma, NOS

1.024 [0.461–2.276]

0.953

 non-Urothelial Carcinoma

1.533 [0.891–2.638]

0.123

Tumor Stage

 Localized

1 [Reference]

 

 Regional

1.730 [1.375–2.176]

< 0.001

 Distant

5.332 [3.610–7.875]

< 0.001

 Unknown

3.017 [0.679–13.411]

0.147

Tumor Size

 Less than 3 cm

1 [Reference]

 

 Greater than 3 cm

1.185 [0.930–1.510]

0.170

 Unknown

1.253 [0.969–1.619]

0.085

Node Density

 None

1 [Reference]

 

  ≤ 0.2

0.941 [0.658–1.344]

0.737

 >0.2

1.410 [1.047–1.898]

0.024

 Unknown

1.487 [1.167–1.895]

0.001

Cancer-Specific Survival

Urinary Diversion

 Ileal Conduit

1 [Reference]

 

 Uretero-cutaneostomy

1.012 [0.748–1.368]

0.940

Age

0.983 [0.928–1.041]

0.561

Sex

 Female

1 [Reference]

 

 Male

0.795 [0.374–1.690]

0.551

Marital Status

 Married

1 [Reference]

 

 Single

1.297 [0.934–1.801]

0.120

 Unknown

1.308 [0.558–3.065]

0.537

Year of Diagnosis

 2004 ~ 2010

1 [Reference]

 

 2011 ~ 2016

1.242 [0.828–1.863]

0.294

Race/Ethnicity

 White

1 [Reference]

 

 Black

0.768 [0.336–1.756]

0.532

 Asian

0.795 [0.367–1.724]

0.561

Insurance

 Insured

1 [Reference]

 

 Uninsured

2.707 [0.354–20.679]

0.337

 Unknown

1.118 [0.789–1.583]

0.532

Tumor Grade

 Urothelial Carcinoma, Low Grade

1 [Reference]

 

 Urothelial Carcinoma, High Grade

0.934 [0.482–1.807]

0.838

 Urothelial Carcinoma, NOS

0.688 [0.185–2.556]

0.577

 non-Urothelial Carcinoma

1.241 [0.547–2.813]

0.606

Tumor Stage

 Localized

1 [Reference]

 

 Regional

2.476 [1.651–3.713]

< 0.001

 Distant

4.035 [2.046–7.959]

< 0.001

 Unknown

3.093 [0.354–27.006]

0.307

Tumor Size

 Less than 3 cm

1 [Reference]

 

 Greater than 3 cm

1.596 [1.057–2.412]

0.026

 Unknown

1.378 [0.872–2.176]

0.17

Node Density

 None

1 [Reference]

 

  ≤ 0.2

1.062 [0.590–1.914]

0.840

 >0.2

2.501 [1.645–3.804]

< 0.001

 Unknown

1.995 [1.340–2.969]

0.001

  1. NOS Not Otherwise Specified, CI Confidence Interval. Node density is nodes positive divided by nodes examined after surgery