Skip to main content

Table 1 Relatives’ background characteristics at baseline (T0), first (T1) and second (T2) follow-up

From: Effects of a staff education programme about person-centred care and promotion of thriving on relatives’ satisfaction with quality of care in nursing homes: a multi-centre, non-equivalent controlled before-after trial

Background characteristics

Total sample (n = 459)

T0

T1

T2

Intervention

(n = 91)

Control (n = 87)

p

Intervention

(n = 80)

Control (n = 69)

p

Intervention (n = 79)

Control (n = 53)

p

Age in years, mean (SD)

64.7 (12.5)

61.6 (12.3)

67.1 (14.0)

< 0.01

64.1 (11.4)

66.3 (12.5)

0.26

64.0 (10.8)

65.3 (13.2)

0.46

Sex, n (%)

 Female

293 (64.4)

63 (70)

49 (56.3)

0.06

56 (71.8)

40 (58.8)

0.14

52 (65.8)

33 (62.3)

0.82

 Male

162 (35.6)

27 (30.0)

38 (43.7)

 

22 (28.2)

28 (41.2)

 

27 (34.2)

20 (37.7)

 

Relation to person living in the nursing home, n (%)

 Son/daughter

309 (67.6)

67 (73.6)

52 (59.8)

0.15

54 (67.5)

45 (65.2)

0.92

57 (73.1)

34 (65.4)

0.33

 Partner/other

148 (32.4)

24 (26.4)

35 (40.2)

 

26 (32.5)

24 (34.8)

 

21 (26.9)

18 (34.6)

 

Frequency of visits, n (%)

 Every week

322 (67.6)

63 (70.0)

60 (69.0)

1.00

55 (68.8)

49 (72.1)

0.80

58 (73.4)

37 (69.8)

0.80

 Every month

135 (29.5)

27 (30.0)

27 (31.0)

 

25 (31.2)

19 (27.9)

 

21 (26.6)

16 (30.2)

 

Older person’s length of stay in months, median (range)

24 (1–360)

24.0 (2–360)

24.0 (1–108)

0.93

27.5 (2–240)

24 (2–136)

0.41

24.0 (2–144)

23 (3–144)

0.62

Study site, n (%)

 Australia

131 (28.5)

30 (33.0)

18 (20.7)

< 0.05

32 (40.0)

18 (26.1)

0.20

33 (41.8)

0 (0.0)

< 0.01

 Norway

148 (32.2)

35 (38.5)

28 (32.2)

 

19 (23.8)

20 (29.0)

 

23 (29.1)

23 (43.4)

 

 Sweden

180 (39.2)

26 (28.5)

41 (47.1)

 

29 (36.3)

31 (44.9)

 

23 (29.1)

30 (56.6)

 
  1. T0 = Baseline, T1 = First follow up, T2 = Second follow up