Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics according to the categorized RAPS (N = 130)

From: Longitudinal association between housing accessibility and activities of daily living: the role of self-efficacy and control in people ageing with Parkinson’s disease

 

Total

Fewer barriers than expected

Expected barriers

More barriers than expected

p-value

 

n = 130 (100%)

n = 38 (29,2%)

n = 63 (48,5%)

n = 29 (22,3%)

 
 

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Chi-square test

Sex (male), T1

84 (64.6)

27 (71.1)

43 (68.3)

14 (48.3)

0.11

Civil status (married/cohabiting), T1

85 (65.4)

27 (71.1)

44 (69.8)

14 (48.3)

0.09

Education (university/college), T1

47 (36.2)

18 (47.4)

23 (36.5)

6 (20.7)

0.08

Lived in Sweden for most of the time, T1

127 (97.7)

36 (94.7)

62 (98.4)

29 (100)

0.32

Own their home, T1

99 (76.2)

31 (81.6)

49 (77.8)

19 (65.5)

0.28

Moved since T1, T2

20 (15.4)

5 (13.2)

10 (15.9)

5 (17.2)

0.89

Housing adjustments since T1, T2

26 (20.6)

12 (32.4)

7 (11.1)

7 (26.9)

0.03

 

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

ANOVA

Age, T1

68.3 (8.6)

70.1 (9.1)

66 (7.8)

71 (8.6)

0.01

External HCB, T1

38.8 (10.6)

39.4 (9.2)

36 (8.8)

44.2 (13.6)

0.003

GSE, T1

29.6 (6.1)

29.4 (5.8)

30.1 (6.4)

28.9 (6.1)

0.67

 

Median (Q1-Q3)

Median (Q1-Q3)

Median (Q1-Q3)

Median (Q1-Q3)

Median test (k samples)

Satisfied with income, T1

7 (5–9)

7.5 (5.8–10)

7 (5–9)

7.5 (5–8)

0.97

PD duration, T1

8 (5–13)

8 (5–11.5)

7 (4–12.3)

10 (6.3–14.8)

0.64

PD severity, HY: off condition, T1

3 (2–4)

2 (1.8–4)

2 (2–3)

3.5 (3–4)

0.03

Depressive symptoms, T1

5 (5–7)

6 (5–7)

5 (5–6)

6 (5–7)

0.07

  1. Note. RAPS relative accessibility problem score; HCB housing-related control beliefs; GSE general self-efficacy; PD Parkinson’s disease; HY Hoehn and Yahr scale; ANOVA one-way analysis of variance