Skip to main content

Table 5 The results of DIF analysis with logistic regression

From: Item response analysis of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory among the elderly in China: dimensionality and differential item functioning test

Item

Sex

Somatic Disease

Statistic

p

R2

Effect size

Statistic

p

R2

Effect size

1

1.46

0.48

0.0015

A

3.66

0.16

0.0105

A

2

0.92

0.63

0.0009

A

5.56

0.06

0.0162

A

3

2.14

0.34

0.0026

A

1.94

0.38

0.0074

A

4

3.06

0.21

0.0034

A

3.92

0.14

0.0118

A

5

1.39

0.50

0.0018

A

0.15

0.93

0.0006

A

6

3.61

0.16

0.0030

A

6.60

0.04a

0.0142

A

7

3.98

0.14

0.0038

A

0.76

0.69

0.0021

A

8

3.96

0.14

0.0030

A

5.98

0.05

0.0125

A

9

2.74

0.25

0.0020

A

3.05

0.22

0.0059

A

10

3.86

0.15

0.0039

A

2.44

0.30

0.0071

A

11

0.15

0.93

0.0001

A

5.32

0.07

0.0134

A

12

4.02

0.13

0.0045

A

8.97

0.01a

0.0289

A

13

3.97

0.14

0.0040

A

6.00

0.04a

0.0184

A

14

3.79

0.15

0.0056

A

3.10

0.21

0.0151

A

15

2.14

0.34

0.0037

A

0.50

0.78

0.0029

A

16

1.36

0.50

0.0018

A

4.61

0.10

0.0173

A

17

0.19

0.91

0.0004

A

0.22

0.90

0.0022

A

18

4.33

0.11

0.0080

A

1.68

0.43

0.0091

A

19

0.89

0.64

0.0014

A

1.13

0.57

0.0052

A

20

6.01

0.04a

0.0062

A

2.12

0.35

0.0061

A

  1. Note. aindicated significance at 0.05 level. The DIF estimates are classified according to effect size as ā€œAā€ (negligible effect), ā€œBā€ (moderate effect), and ā€œCā€ (large effectā€)