Skip to main content

Table 1 Study and patient characteristics (original studies included in this review)

From: A systematic review of the intervention components, adherence and outcomes of enhanced recovery programmes in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery

Original study

Country and setting

Study-design

Population

Sample

Age median (range) or mean (±SD), in y

Inclusion criteria

(original study)

Exclusion criteria

(original study)

Zeng 2017 [16]

China

Monocentric, academic

Database analysis

Colorectal

Laparoscopic

Cancer

94 ERP ≥ 75y

157 CC ≥75y

78 (75–88)

78 (75–90)

≥75y

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Colorectal cancer

Emergency surgery

Non-radical resection

TNM stage IV

Multi-organ resection

Pirrera 2017 [17]

Italy

Monocentric, non-academic

Database analysis

Colorectal

Laparoscopic

Cancer/Benign

203 ERP > 75y

175 ERP 66-75y

211 ERP ≤65y

80 (range NR)

69 (range NR)

56 (range NR)

Colorectal resection

Scheduled for laparoscopic approach

Emergency surgery

Palliative procedure

Forsmo 2017 [18]

Norway

Monocentric, academic

Secondary analysis of RCT data

Colorectal

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

19 ERP ≥ 80y

56 ERP 66-79y

79 ERP ≤ 65y

83 (80–89)

72 (66–78)

58 (23–65)

≥18y

Colorectal surgery

With or without stoma

Malignant or benign

Multi-organ resection

ASA 4

Emergency surgery

Impaired mental capacity

Braga 2017 [19]

Peri-operative Italian Society Registry

(11 hospitals)

Database analysis

Colorectal

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

93 ERP > 80 y

117 ERP 76-80y

105 ERP 71-75y

84 (SD ± 3)

77 (SD ± 2)

73 (SD ± 1)

>70y

Elective colorectal surgery

/

Braga 2016 [20]

Peri-operative Italian Society Registry

(11 hospitals)

Database analysis

Colorectal

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

167 ERP ≥ 70y, ASA 1–2

162 ERP ≥ 70y, ASA 3–4

279 ERP <70y, ASA 1–2

98 ERP <70y, ASA 3–4

77 (SD ± 4.6)

78 (SD ± 5.3)

58 (SD ±9)

63 (SD ±5.7)

Elective colorectal surgery

/

Gonzalez-Ayora 2016 [21]

Spain

Multicentric, academic

Database analysis

Colorectal

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

188 ERP ≥ 70y

79 (70–93)

≥70y

Colorectal surgery

Emergency surgery

Palliative procedure

Pedziwiatr 2015 [22]

Poland

Monocentric, academic

Database analysis

Colorectal

Laparoscopic

Cancer

34 ERP ≥ 80y

43 ERP ≤55y

83 (IQR 82–87)

50 (IQR 44–54)

≥80y or ≤ 55y

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Colorectal adenocarcinoma

Emergency surgery

Multi-organ or transanal resection

Concomitant IBD

ICU stay after surgery

Kisialeuski 2015 [23]

Poland

Monocentric, academic

Prospective observational cohort study

Colorectal

Laparoscopic

Cancer

49 ERP > 65y

43 ERP ≤65y

76.3 (SD NR)

55.8 (SD NR)

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Colorectal cancer

Emergency surgery

Multi-organ resection

Jia 2014 [24]

China

Monocentric, academic

RCT

Colorectal

Open

Cancer

117 ERP ≥ 70y

116 CC ≥70y

75.7 (SD ± 4.2)

74.8 (SD ±4.0)

≥70y

Admitted for open curative resection

Colorectal carcinoma

Dementia, Parkinson, alcohol intake ≥250 g/d, long term sleeping pills or anxiolytics, anaesthesia ≤30d

Intra-operative blood transfusion or ICU stay after surgery

Keller

2013 [25]

USA

Monocentric, academic

Database analysis

Colonic

Laparoscopic

Cancer/Benign

153 ERP ≥ 70y

302 ERP <70y

77.9 (SD ± 6.1)

52.4 (SD ±13.7)

Elective laparoscopic colon resection (conversions included)

Incomplete medical or financial records

Feroci 2013 [26]

Italy

Monocentric, non-academic

Database analysis

Colorectal

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

204 ERP ≥ 75y

402 ERP <75y

Overall:

70 (30–94)

Elective colorectal resection (multiple previous laparotomies are included)

ASA grades 1 to 4

Medically unfit for surgery

Cancer with distant metastasis

<18y or pregnant

Baek 2013 [27]

Korea

Monocentric, academic

Prospective observational cohort study

Colorectal

Laparoscopic

Cancer

77 ERP ≥ 70y

226 ERP <70y

74.8 (SD ± 4.2)

56.7 (SD ±8.9)

Laparoscopic or robotic surgery Colorectal cancer

Emergency surgery

ASA 4

ICU stay after surgery

Conversion (laparoscopic to open)

Wang 2012 [28]

China

Monocentric, academic

RCT

Colorectal

Laparoscopic

Cancer

40 ERP ≥ 65y

38 CC ≥65y

71 (65–81)

72 (65–82)

≥ 65y

Laparoscopic colorectal resection

Colorectal cancer

Distant metastasis (involving pelvic, urethra of iliac vessel invasion)

Poor cardiopulmonary function

Pawa 2012 [29]

UK

Monocentric, academic

Database analysis

Colorectal

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

130 ERP ≥ 80y

558 ERP < 80y

83 (80–95)

66 (17–79)

Colorectal resection

None

Walter 2011 [30]

UK

Monocentric, non-academic

Database analysis; retrospective control group

Colorectal

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

68 ERP ≥ 80y

332 ERP < 80y

200 CC

Overall:

67 (IQR 56–77)

69 (IQR 57–78)

Major colorectal resections

First 400 consecutive, non-selected, patients managed within an ERP

Last 200 patients pre-ERP

Emergency surgery

Kahokehr 2011 [31]

New Zealand

Monocentric, academic

Prospective observational cohort study

Colonic

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

22 ERP > 75y

78 ERP ≤75y

Overall:

67.5 (IQR 31–92)

Elective colonic surgery within an ERP

Rectal cancer ≤15 cm from the anal verge, patients requiring a stoma or unable to participate (language, cognitive impairment, ASA ≥4)

Rumstadt 2009 [32]

Germany

FTCII programme

(24 hospitals)

Database analysis

Colonic

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

207 ERP ≥ 80y

535 ERP 70-79y

74.7 (70–79.9)

83.4 (80–95.7)

≥ 70y

Elective colonic resection

Emergency surgery

Perforation or abscess with septic inflammatory response syndrome

Hendry 2009 [33]

UK, Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands

Multicentric, academic

Database analysis

Colorectal

Open

Cancer/Benign

194 ERP ≥ 80y

839 ERP <80

Overall:

59 (IQR 69–78)

Elective open colorectal surgery with formation of an anastomosis

In case of rectal cancer: tumour in the upper 1/3 of the rectum and allows anastomosis in the middle 1/3

ASA grade 1 to 4

Total mesorectal excision

Scharfen-berg 2007 [34]

Germany

Monocentric, academic

Prospective observational cohort study

Colonic

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

74 ERP > 70y

74 (71–88)

>  70y

Elective colonic resection

Benign or malignant disease

Not operated on electively

Senagore 2003 [35]

USA

Monocentric, academic

Retrospective observational cohort study

Colonic

Open/Lap

Cancer/Benign

50 ERP ≥ 70y, lap

123 ERP ≥ 70y, open

181 ERP <60y, lap

122 ERP <60y, open

77.5 (SE ± 4.6)

77.8 (SE ± 5.4)

42.4 (SE ±12.3)

46.7 (SE ±9.8)

4 age-matched cohorts

Elective segmental colectomy

Laparoscopic/open when excluded for laparoscopic approach based on standardised criteria

Prior major abdominal surgery

Incomplete data

Bardram 2000 [36]

Denmark

Monocentric, academic

Retrospective observational cohort study

Colonic

Laparoscopic

Cancer/Benign

39 ERP ≥ 70y, lap

11 ERP ≥70y, converted

Overall:

81 (70–93)

Laparoscopic colonic resection

Laparoscopic surgery

70–75y: benign disease or malignant disease with severe cardiopulmonary disease

>  75y: malignant disease

Not elective

Tumours in the transverse colon or rectum

Patients not self-caring and not admitted directly from home

  1. LEGEND: RCT randomised controlled trial, ERP enhanced recovery programme, CC conventional care, vs versus, y years old, g gram, d day, lap laparoscopic, SD standard deviation, SE standard error of the mean, NR not reported, TNM tumour node metastasis, ASA American society of anaesthesiologists physical status class, IBD inflammatory bowel disease, ICU intensive care unit, FTCII fast track colon II open quality assurance programme; Bold: patient group included in this review