Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of participants (N = 25)

From: A comparison between an ICT tool and a traditional physical measure for frailty evaluation in older adults

Variables

n (%)

M (SD)

Age, years

 

71 (6)

Gender, number of women

15 (60)

 

BMI, kg/m2

 

29.4 (7.6)

Marital status

 Married

13 (52)

 

 Not married

3 (12)

 

 Widowed

9 (36)

 

Level of education

 Primary school, 5 years

5 (20)

 

 Secondary school, 8 years

8 (32)

 

 High school diploma, 13 years

9 (36)

 

 University degree, 18 years

3 (12)

 

Chronic disease, number of Yes

15 (60)

 

Pharmacotherapy, number of Yes

17 (68)

 

MI provided by ADAMO, %

 Low Activity

 

51.4 (11.2)

 Moderate Activity

 

29.2 (9.8)

 Vigorous Activity

 

19.4 (9.7)

400 m walk test, s

 

326 (93)

TFI, points

 

5 (5)

 Physical TFI

 

2 (1)

 Psychological TFI

 

1 (1)

 Social TFI

 

1 (1)

Level of frailty a

 Frail persons

14 (56)

 

 Robust persons

11 (44)

 
  1. Notes: a Individuals with a score equal or higher than 5 were classified frail. M, mean; SD, Standard Deviation; BMI, Body Mass Index; TFI, Tilburg Frailty Indicator, higher score corresponded to more severe frailty condition; MI, Mobility index