Table 3 The mean difference and the Cohen’s d effect size from the inferential analysis
Subgroups | Mean difference | Cohen’s d |
|---|---|---|
R HGS, men 55 years old (n = 58) versus R HGS, men 89 years old (n = 31) | 19.73 | 6.98 |
L HGS, men 55 years old (n = 58) versus L HGS, men 89 years old (n = 31) | 18.65 | 6.29 |
Relative HGS – R/L, men 55 years old (n = 58) versus relative HGS – R/L, men 89 years old (n = 31) | 1.19 | 4.85 |
D HGS, men 55 years old (n = 58) versus D HGS, men 89 years old (n = 31) | 20.14 | 8.36 |
ND HGS, men 55 years old (n = 58) versus ND HGS, men 89 years (n = 31) | 18.24 | 8.72 |
Relative HGS – D/ND, men 55 years old (n = 58) versus relative HGS – D/ND, men 89 years old (n = 31) | 1.19 | 4.85 |
R HGS, women 55 years old (n = 62) versus R HGS, women 89 years old (n = 39) | 13.62 | 7.04 |
L HGS, women 55 years old (n = 62) versus L HGS, women 89 years old (n = 39) | 12.98 | 8.94 |
Relative HGS – R/L, women 55 years old (n = 62) versus relative HGS – R/L, women 89 years old (n = 39) | 0.9 | 5.66 |
D HGS, women 55 years old (n = 62) versus D HGS, women 89 years old (n = 39) | 13.65 | 7.48 |
ND HGS, women 55 years old (n = 62) versus ND HGS, women 89 years old (n = 39) | 12.95 | 9.37 |
Relative HGS – D/ND, women 55 years old (n = 62) versus relative HGS – D/ND, women 89 years old (n = 39) | 0.9 | 5.66 |