From: A comparison of perceived uselessness between centenarians and non-centenarians in China
Age at death | Model I | Model II | Model III | Model IV | Model V | Model VI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High frequency relative to low frequency | ||||||
Survived to age 100 vs. died at ages 91–94 | 0.62* (0.41–0.91) | 0.64* (0.42–0.97) | 0.62* (0.41–0.84) | 0.74 (0.48–1.12) | 0.80 (0.52–1.22) | 0.85 (0.55–1.32) |
Survived to age 100 vs. died at ages 95–99 | 0.98 (0.77–1.24) | 1.02 (0.80–1.29) | 0.98 (0.78–1.24) | 1.11 (0.88–1.43) | 1.16 (0.91–1.47) | 1.25 (0.97–1.60) |
Moderate frequency relative to low frequency | ||||||
Survived to age 100 vs. died at ages 91–94 | 0.61* (0.41–0.91) | 0.62* (0.42–0.93) | 0.61* (0.41–0.91) | 0.64* (0.43–0.97) | 0.69+ (0.47–1.04) | 0.71+ (0.48–1.06) |
Survived to age 100 vs. died at ages 95–99 | 0.93 (0.75–1.17) | 0.95 (0.76–1.19) | 0.94 (0.75–1.17) | 0.98 (0.78–1.23) | 1.02 (0.81–1.28) | 1.04 (0.82–1.31) |