Skip to main content

Table 2 Results intervention on adverse outcomes

From: Interventions for frail community-dwelling older adults have no significant effect on adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OS. Author

Mortality [CI]

Institutionalization [CI]

Health costs [CI]

Accidental falls[CI]

Hospitalization [CI]

01.Cameron et al.

1.28 [0.53, 3.09]

–

–

–

–

01.Fairhall et al.

–

–

–

1.12 [0.78, 1.63]

–

01.Fairhall et al.

–

0.83 [0.46, 1.53]

4.8%

–

1.47 [0.87, 2.47]

02.De Vriendt et al.

2.89 [0.12, 72.08]

–

–

–

–

03.Dorrestein et al.

1.20 [0.41, 3.49]

–

–

0.86 [0.65, 1.13]

–

04.Favela et al.

0.98 [0.13, 7.26]

–

–

–

–

04.Favela et al.

0.49 [0.04, 5.59]

–

–

–

–

05.Hall et al.

0.79 [0.36, 1.71]

0.32 [0.12, 0.87]

–

–

–

06.Kehusmaa et al.

0.85 [0.39, 1.83]

1.28 [0.79, 2.06]

30%

–

1.03 [0.77, 1.39]

07.Kim et al.

3.19 [0.13, 81.25]

–

–

–

–

08.Kono et al.

0.52 [0.24, 1.13]

1.70 [0.40, 7.23]

-11.8%

–

–

09.Kono et al.

1.35 [0.69, 2.64]

2.41 [0.61, 9.49]

 

–

–

10.Metzelthin et al.

1.21 [0.53, 2.76]

–

–

–

–

10.Metzelthin et al.

–

0.65 [0.20, 2.18]

29%

–

0.92 [0.55, 1.55]

11.Monteserin et al.

0.59 [0.24, 1.43]

0.59 [0.10, 3.56]

–

–

–

12.Perttila et al.

–

–

–

0.43 [0.33, 0.57]

–

13.Upatising et al.

7.48 [0.35, 157.7]

–

–

–

–

14.Van Hout et al.

0.86 [0.54, 1.37]

1.12 [0.60, 2.08]

–

–

1.23 [0.90, 1.68]

15.Van Leeuwen et al.

1.11 [0.50, 2.48]

–

–

–

–

15.Van Leeuwen et al.

0.88 [0.49, 1.56]

–

–

–

–

15.Van Leeuwen et al.

1.37 [0.75, 2.48]

–

–

–

–

16.Williams et al.

–

1.30 [0.33, 5.09]

–

–

1.11 [0.51, 2.42]

  1. mortality, institutionalization, and hospitalization as odds ratio [Confidence Interval]; formal health costs as ratio intervention group relative to control group; accidental falls as IRR; double data are not reported. OS = original study. - = missing. Van Leeuwen et al. and Favela et al. are studies with several arms