Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of geriatric patients with severe sacral PUs managed with couple-kissing flap

From: Couple-kissing flaps for successful repair of severe sacral pressure ulcers in frail elderly patients

No.

Sex

Age (years)

Predisposing factor

Duration of PUs (months)

Defect location of PUs

Sacral defect size (length × width)

Identified pathogens of the wound

Operation time (mins)

Suture removal (days)

Follow-up (months)

1

F

72

Stroke

1.5

Sacral and ischial tuberosity

7.0 × 4.5

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

65

15

13

2

M

74

Stroke

2.5

Sacral

6.0 × 5.0

Enterobacter cloacae

90

14

13

3

M

71

Spinal cord injury

5.0

Sacral and trochanteric

5.0 × 7.0

MRSA

75

16

14

4

F

82

Stroke

0.8

Sacral and ischial tuberosity

6.5 × 4.0

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

60

15

9

5

F

75

Stroke

3.5

Sacral

7.0 × 5.5

Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii

85

15

14

6

M

92

Spinal cord injury

2.8

Sacral and trochanteric

8.0 × 10.0

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

90

16

12

7

M

71

Stroke

1.3

Sacral

6.0 × 4.5

Negative

105

14

24

8

F

73

Stroke

4.2

Sacral and lateral malleolar

6.0 × 7.0

Enterobacter cloacae

75

15

16

9

M

75

Stroke

3.3

Sacral

7.5 × 6.0

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

80

14

13

10

M

80

Senile valetudinariarianism

2.9

Sacral and trochanteric

5.5 × 5.0

Negative

95

16

12

11

F

82

Stroke

4.5

Sacral and trochanteric

7.0 × 6.5

Staphylococcus aureus

85

15

12

12

M

75

Severe malnutrition

2.6

Sacral

8.5 × 6.0

Negative

115

17

11

  1. F female, M male, MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus