Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the regression analysis: final models

From: Factors influencing decision regret regarding placement of a PEG among substitute decision-makers of older persons in Japan: a prospective study

  

Bivariate regression analysis

Multiple regression analysis

Variable

Mean

β

F

P

β

F

P

Dependent variable: Decision regret of substitute decision-maker

Patients

 Gender/male

33.86

−0.209

1.866

0.179

0.171

0.521

0.476

 Gender/female

30.42

      

 Survival/survived

30.83

0.034

0.048

0.827

−0.207

0.547

0.465

 Survival/died

34.05

      

 PEG placed

38.19

−0.423

8.732

0.005

0.796

9.925

0.004

 PEG withheld

24.82

      

 Patient can convey own wishes

25.00

−0.427

1.514

0.226

−0.411

1.873

0.182

Patient cannot convey own wishes

33.13

      

Substitute decision-makers

 Gender/male

30.44

0.209

1.866

0.179

−0.071

0.068

0.797

 Gender/female

33.61

      

 Age

 

0.010

0.004

0.948

0.015

1.719

0.200

 Relationship/child of patient

30.40

−0.099

0.409

0.526

0.126

0.237

0.630

 Relationship/not child of patient

34.16

      

Consulted with

 Medical staff

35.81

0.132

0.695

0.409

−0.166

0.215

0.646

 Nobody

28.38

      

Physician’s recommendation

 Either withhold or place PEG

35.20

−0.252

2.787

0.103

0.194

0.424

0.520

 No recommendation

24.10

      

Decision conflict of substitute decision-makers

 

0.583

21.091

<0.001

0.625

21.945

<0.001

  1. Gender: 1 = male, 2 = female
  2. Survival: 1 = survived, 2 = died
  3. PEG: 1 = PEG placed, 2 = withheld
  4. Patient’s wishes: 1 = patient can convey own wishes, 2 = patient cannot convey own wishes
  5. Relationship: 1 = child of patient, 2 = not child of patient
  6. Consulted with: 1 = medical staff, 2 = nobody
  7. Physician’s recommendation: 1 = either withhold or place PEG, 2 = no recommendation