Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey

Table 4 Concurrent validity of the C-HiP Index

Characteristic	Affective/Cognitive^a		Behavioural		C-HiP index^a
Characteristic	Median	P-value	Median	P-value	Median	P-value
Aware of padded hip fracture
Yes (n = 203, 38%)	36.0	p < 0.01*	20.0	p < 0.01*	56.0	p < 0.01*
No (n = 326, 62%)	40.0	p < 0.01*	21.0	p < 0.01*	60.3	p < 0.01*
Existence of a champion
Yes (n = 397, 75%)	40.0	p < 0.01*	21.0	p < 0.01*	61.0	p < 0.01*
No (n = 132, 25%)	35.0	p < 0.01*	19.0	p < 0.01*	54.0	p < 0.01*

* p < 0.01 in each multiply imputed dataset; Mann-Whitney U tests
^aAfter removal of the cognitive item (COG06), “I doubt the effectiveness of hip protectors”

ISSN: 1471-2318