Skip to main content

Table 6 Rating of measurement properties against thresholds

From: Person-centredness in the care of older adults: a systematic review of questionnaire-based scales and their measurement properties

Measure

Study

Internal consistency

Reliability

Measurement error

Content validity

Structural validity

Hypothesis testing

Cross-cultural

Specific measures

 

 ICI

Chappell et al. [29]

? (3/4)

? (1/4)

 

?

-

?

 
 

Charalambous et al. [30]

? (3/4)

    

-

 
 

O’Rourke et al. [31]

? (7/8)

   

+

  

 P-CAT

Edvardsson et al. [32]

? (3/4)

? (1/4)

 

+

+

  
 

Zhong & Lou [33]

? (1/4)

   

?

-

?

 

Sjogren et al. [34]

+

? (1/3)

  

-

 

?

 

Rokstad et al. [35]

+

+

  

-

 

?

 PCFC

Rose et al. [46]

+

  

?

?

  

 PCHC

Dow et al. [48]

? (4/8)

  

+

+

  

 PDC

White et al. [47]

+

  

+

+

  
 

Sullivan et al. [52]

+

  

+

   

 ‘Untitled’

Terada et al. [45]

?

+

 

?

   

Generic measures

 

 PCQ (Staff version)

Edvardsson et al. [36]

+

    

?

 
 

Bergland et al. [37]

+

-

 

?

+

?

?

 PCQ (Patient version)

Bergland et al. [38]

?

+

 

?

 

?

?

 MPOCA

Bamm et al. [44]

?

+

 

?

 

?

 

 CCCQ

de Witte et al. [39]

+

  

?

+

+

 
 

Bruus et al. [40]

?

     

?

 

Bosman et al. [41]

+

    

?

 
 

Muntinga et al. [42]

?

+

?

 

+

-

 

 ICS-N

Suhonen et al. [43]

+

   

?

  

 CCRQ

Cott et al. [49]

?

+

 

+

 

?

 
  1. ‘+’ indicates that the threshold was met; ‘-‘indicates that the threshold was failed’ ‘?’ indicates that a rating could not be determined from the results presented. Where results are inconsistent across subscales, a ‘?’ rating is given. Parentheses then how many of the subscales met the relevant thresholds. Empty cells indicate the property was not assessed in the reference