Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 19 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kieran McCaul |
| 25 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Len Gray |
| 12 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Lafortune |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Lafortune |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 13 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Lafortune |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 2 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Lafortune |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 2 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| 3 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Lafortune |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 3 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-9-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.