Table 3 Comparison of gender and ADL of participants (n = 1,085)* by different types of transportation services offered by programs (n = 53)
From: Gender differences in the use of transportation services to community rehabilitation programs
Service | Programs | Participant | Gender |  | ADL (mean ± SD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | N (%) | N (%) | Male | Female | Â | Total | Â | Male | Female | p |
No service | 20 (38%) | 215 (20%) | 138(64%)a | 77 (36%) |  | 8.8 ± 3.0 |  | 9.7 ± 3.3 | 8.8 ± 2.4 | .023 |
Bus stop | 13 (25%) | 395 (36%) | 215 (54%) | 180 (45%) |  | 9.0 ± 2.8 |  | 9.7 ± 3.0 | 8.9 ± 2.5 | .005 |
Door-to-door | 17 (32%) | 411 (38%) | 224 (55%) | 187 (46%) | p = .007b | 9.9 ± 3.4 | < .0001c | 10.5 ± 3.5 | 10.3 ± 3.4 | .482 |
Other | 3 (6%) | 64 (3%) | 46 (72%) | 18 (28%) |  | 9.7 ± 3.0 |  | 9.7 ± 3.0 | 9.6 ± 3.0 | .941 |
Total | 53 (100%) | 1,085 (100%) | 623 (57%) | 462 (43%) |  | 9.3 ± 3.1 |  | 9.3 ± 3.2 | 8.8 ± 3.0 | .006 |