Peer Review reports
From: Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Jul 2003 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 5 Aug 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Schatz |
| 18 Aug 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helena Kraemer |
| 9 Sep 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Glen Doniger |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Sep 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Oct 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Glen Doniger |
| 23 Oct 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Schatz |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 23 Oct 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 Oct 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Glen Doniger |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 Oct 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 31 Oct 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helena Kraemer |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Nov 2003 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Nov 2003 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-3-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.