Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 May 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kilian Rapp |
12 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Colleen Maxwell |
13 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elmar Graessel |
21 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kajsa Eklund |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kajsa Eklund |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kilian Rapp |
5 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elmar Graessel |
8 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Colleen Maxwell |
28 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kajsa Eklund |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kajsa Eklund |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
23 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-13-76 |
You can find further information about peer review here.