Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Crome |
| 27 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Heckman |
| 30 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert McKelvie |
| 21 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Close |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Close |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Close |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 16 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Crome |
| 20 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - George Heckman |
| 11 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Close |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 19 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Close |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 19 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-12-70 |
You can find further information about peer review here.