Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Henwood |
10 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Hill |
15 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Astrid Zech |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Henwood |
5 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Hill |
11 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doungkamol Sindhusake |
31 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Astrid Zech |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Henwood |
21 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doungkamol Sindhusake |
1 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Hill |
18 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Astrid Zech |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
3 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-12-68 |
You can find further information about peer review here.