Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
14 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - La-or Chailurkit |
26 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Pietschmann |
10 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nienke Bleijenberg |
11 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirsti Uusi-Rasi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - La-or Chailurkit |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
11 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - La-or Chailurkit |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
11 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
20 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - La-or Chailurkit |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
20 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
30 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-12-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.