Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
10 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ayumi Kono |
16 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tami Saito |
19 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Winningham |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
4 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ayumi Kono |
9 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Winningham |
10 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tami Saito |
12 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hege Bøen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
19 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Winningham |
26 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ayumi Kono |
31 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tami Saito |
13 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hege Bøen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
27 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tami Saito |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
23 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
20 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-12-20 |
You can find further information about peer review here.