Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Namkee Choi |
24 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
14 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Namkee Choi |
31 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
16 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
14 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laura Sands |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
16 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacqueline Quail |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
16 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
19 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-11-86 |
You can find further information about peer review here.