Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Kaskie |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Kaskie |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Kaskie |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
17 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - marc sabbe |
31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrea Gruneir |
2 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mauro Di Bari |
1 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Kaskie |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
11 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mauro Di Bari |
19 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrea Gruneir |
22 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - marc sabbe |
12 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Kaskie |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
12 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
14 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Kaskie |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
21 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-11-65 |
You can find further information about peer review here.