Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Judy Dillworth |
29 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lewis Goldfrank |
12 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Sherman |
27 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Sherman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
24 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lewis Goldfrank |
28 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Judy Dillworth |
18 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ryan Lennon |
12 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ryan Lennon |
7 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bronagh Walsh |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
18 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-11-62 |
You can find further information about peer review here.