Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Geriatrics

Volume 10 Supplement 1

de Senectute: Age and Health Forum

Open Access

Surgery of diabetic foot in the elderly: early Vs deferred treatment

  • A Bruttocao1,
  • C Terranova2,
  • B Martella1,
  • S Spirch1,
  • R Nistri1,
  • M Gruppo1,
  • F Mazzalai1,
  • R Lorenzetti1 and
  • C Militello1
BMC Geriatrics201010(Suppl 1):A46

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-S1-A46

Published: 19 May 2010

Background

In 1996, the overall prevalence of diabetic patients was 120 million and it will more than double by the year 2025.

The most important complication in these patients is the diabetic foot (sepsis, abscess etc.).

The aim of this study was to assess the role and results of surgery, performed in emergency or deferred emergency, in older population affected by acute septic foot.

Materials and methods

From 01.01.2004 to 31.12.2008, 100 patients (average age 74.5 ± 7.3) affected by insulin dependent diabetes complicated by sepsis and abscess of the lower limb were treated in emergency surgery. The inclusion of subjects in the study was considered ethically correct assessment by medical examiner.

61 patients were submitted after a visit to immediate surgical drainage and toilets (group A), while 59 patients were transferred from other departments after an average stay of 6.9 ± 3.6 days during which only conservative therapy had been implemented (group B).

Results

No differences were found between the 2 groups regarding age and clinical features (general conditions, concomitant diseases etc.), except for the following differences in Group B: higher levels of glucose in the blood (P = 0.015), lower levels of albumin (P = 0.005), and more frequent extension of inflammatory processes to proximal regions of leg (P = 0.005).

The resolution was achieved in group A, without amputation in 13 patients, with amputation of 1 or more toes in 28, with metatarsal amputation in 18 and with Chopart amputation in 2 cases.

Group B: incision and drainage were sufficient only in 4 patients, amputation of 1 or more toes in 21, minor amputations (metatarsal) in 10, Chopart amputations in 20 patients and mayor amputations (leg) in 4 cases.

The level of amputation was significantly more proximal in group B (Chi2 = 24.3 P < 0.001).

The logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship between the level of amputation and the number of days elapsed before debridement (odds ratio, 1.61; P = 0.015; confidence interval, 1.10–2.36), but not in the presence of peripheral occlusive disease (odds ratio, 1.72, P = 0.376; confidence interval, 0.28–15.2).

Conclusions

In elderly patients with a diabetic foot, the function of the lower limbs is significantly reduced in the case of delayed surgical debridment because of the inflammatory process.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinic of Geriatric Surgery, Hospital University of Padua
(2)
Unit of Forensic Toxicology and Antidoping, Hospital University of Padua

Copyright

© Bruttocao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement