Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
5 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McCann |
20 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Timo Strandberg |
9 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McCann |
10 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
13 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
13 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
14 Jul 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Jul 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-10-47 |
You can find further information about peer review here.