Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 5 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McCann |
| 20 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Timo Strandberg |
| 9 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 15 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McCann |
| 10 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 12 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 12 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 13 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - William Hung |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 13 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Jul 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Jul 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-10-47 |
You can find further information about peer review here.