Skip to main content
Download PDF

Predictors of basic and instrumental activities of daily living among older adults with multiple chronic conditions

BMC Geriatrics volume 24, Article number: 383 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Understanding the predictors of functional status can be useful for improving modifiable predictors or identifying at-risk populations. Researchers have examined the predictors of functional status in older adults, but there has not been sufficient study in this field in older adults with multiple chronic conditions, especially in Iran. Consequently, the results of this body of research may not be generalizable to Iran. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the predictors of functional status in Iranian older adults with multiple chronic conditions.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 118 Iranian older adults with multiple chronic conditions were recruited from December 2022 to September 2023. They were invited to respond to questionnaires inquiring about their demographic and health information, basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), depression and cognitive status. The predictors included age, gender, marital status, education, number of chronic conditions, and depression. Descriptive and analytical statistical tests (univariate and multiple regression analysis) were used to analyze the data.

Results

The majority of participants were married (63.9%) and women (59.3%). Based on the results of the multiple regression analysis, age (B=-0.04, P = 0.04), depression (B=-0.12, P = 0.04), and IADL (B = 0.46, P < 0.001) were significant predictors for functional status in terms of BADL. Also, marital status (B=-0.51, P = 0.05), numbers of chronic conditions (B=-0.61, P = 0.002), and BADL (B = 0.46, P < 0.001) were significant predictors for functional status in terms of IADL.

Conclusion

The findings support the predictive ability of age, marital status, number of chronic diseases, and depression for the functional status. Older adults with multiple chronic conditions who are older, single, depressed and with more chronic conditions number are more likely to have limitations in functional status. Therefore, nurses and other health care providers can benefit from the results of this study and identify and pay more attention to the high risk older adult population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Aging is a pervasive biological process that leads to a progressive and irreversible decline in physical function in all organ systems caused by the accumulation of damage in response to a variety of stressors [1]. Compared to other age groups, older adults are the most prone to have chronic diseases and disability [2]. More than 50% of the older adult population suffer from two or more chronic conditions or multiple chronic conditions [3, 4]. In Iran, the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions is increasing, and the burden caused by them in older adults is estimated at 90–92% [5]. It is estimated that between 2015 and 2035, the proportion of older adults with multiple chronic conditions will almost double (2015:9.8%; 2035:17.0%) [6]. Consequently, the growing older adult population with chronic conditions has become an important public health concern [7]. Multiple chronic conditions are associated with increased healthcare utilization [8], impaired mental health [9, 10], decreased quality of life [11] and increased functional limitations in performing basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) [12]. Studies conducted in different countries including China, Norway, Poland, and Spain have identified a significant relationship between multiple chronic conditions and functional status [13,14,15,16]. Functional status refers to a person’s capacity to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living (BADL and IADL) [17]. The proportion of older adults experiencing limitations in their capacity to perform BADL and IADL differs significantly in different parts of the world. For example, in one study in Turkey, it was reported that 11.2% of older adults were limited in BADL and 45.8% were limited in IADL [18] whereas in Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of ADL and IADL disability in older adults has been estimated at 24.6% and 58.5%, respectively [19]. In Iran, the prevalence of BADL and IADL disability in older adults has been estimated at 2.5% and 48.2%, respectively [20]. Despite the existence of studies on functional status especially in developed countries, no studies have examined the predictors of functional status in older adults with multiple chronic conditions in Iran. Compared to developed countries, Iran has different health and social support systems policies especially for older adults, in which a number of them were not successful [21]. Social support is recognized as an important social determinant of health, as it helps people meet their physical and emotional needs and reduces the effects of stressful events on their lives [22], therefore, the lack of suitable support systems for older adults can affect the level of their functional status. In addition, in most developed countries, policies are aimed at providing geriatric services to older adults at home and community-based services to cover a wider range of services and also to empower older adults to live independently in society [23]. Meanwhile, in Iran, community-based geriatric services, as well as the policy of providing integrated services, have quantitative and qualitative defects especially in implementation process [24]. The most important obstacles to the implementation of general health policies in Iran were the lack of formulated strategies, poor management, lack of a comprehensive national action plan, minimal information infrastructure, and insufficient funding [25]. Consequently, due to the difference in health and support system policies especially for older adults in Iran compared to other countries, the levels of functional status or ability to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living can be different in older adults, therefore, the results in other countries may not be generalizable to Iran. In addition, one of the important goals in the health care of patients with multiple chronic conditions is to improve their functional status, and to achieve this goal, it is necessary to understand the predictors of functional status because some predictors may be modifiable and thus may be treatable. Also, there may be some unmodifiable predictors that can be used to identify at-risk populations. In addition, understanding the predictors of functional status can guide the development of healthcare programs targeting older adults with multiple chronic conditions [26]. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the predictors of functional status in Iranian older adults with multiple chronic conditions.

Conceptual framework

The study was guided by the World Health Organization’s ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) conceptual model. The ICF model conceptualizes an individual’s level of functioning as a dynamic interaction between the individual’s health conditions and contextual factors [27]. Contextual factors in the ICF guide users of the model to consider the impact of environmental factors (e.g., organizational policies) and personal factors (e.g., age, gender) on a person’s overall functioning and disability [28]. Accordingly, based on this conceptual model, we conceptualized that an individual’s health conditions (number of chronic conditions and depression), and contextual factors (age, gender, marital status, and education) predict functional status in older adults with multiple chronic conditions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hypothetical conceptual model

Full size image

The literature is also organized around the factors conceptualized as influencing functional status in the study population. The review of the literature includes studies that report findings in this regard. Female gender has been proposed as one of the predictors of functional status [29]. Explanations for gender differences in functional status are varied and reflect a complex interaction between biological and environmental factors [30]. Women suffer from more disabilities [31]. Women report experiencing more stressful life events and chronic stress in areas such as child and family health, which may translate into poorer functioning [32]. Education has also been found to predict functional status [29]. Researchers have identified that increased resource availability linked to higher education may reduce limitations related to health conditions [33]. Marital status has also been found to predict functional status. The protective role of marriage is a strong social relationship that may lead to better health and function because spouses have a key role in physical and emotional support [34]. Spouses may help with medication adherence, prepare and encourage eating healthy meals [34]. Age has also been found to adversely predict functional status [29, 35]. When people age, frailty and disability appear. Frailty is defined as a common and important aging syndrome characterized by age-related decline in physiological reserve and function of multi-organ systems, leading to increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes and functional limitations [35, 36]. It has been found that the number of chronic conditions rather than specific conditions, or severity of conditions may is more associated with limitations in BADL and IADL [37]. Accumulation of chronic diseases in older adults increases the complexity of drug administration, and the possibility of limitations in functional status increases [38]. Depression can be among other factors that predict the functional status in older adults. Older adults with depressive symptoms may be less likely to adhere to treatment regimens, which in turn may be associated with the onset or progression of health conditions that leading to impaired functional status [39]. Also, biological changes associated with depressive symptoms, such as increased cortisol levels and insulin resistance, may increase the risks of functional status impairment [40]. Therefore, in this study, the factors included age, gender, marital status, education, number of chronic conditions, and depression were conceptualized as possible factors that can predict functional status in Iranian older adults with multiple chronic conditions.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to September 2023 at one of the largest hospitals in the north of Iran.

Setting & sample

In the present study, older adult patients were recruited from the medical departments of one of the largest hospitals in the north of Iran. This hospital is a referral center for the province and neighboring provinces and a super-specialized center for all medical fields such as endocrinology, lung, nephrology, and rheumatology. The samples were recruited by convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria included adults aged 60 years and older, with at least two chronic conditions [41] that were assessed by self-reports, no cognitive impairment based on abbreviated mental test, consciousness and ability to communicate and desire to participate in the study. The minimum required sample size was determined as 108, based on the sample size formula for multiple regression and considering the anticipated effect size 0.15, desired statistical power level 0.8, number of predictors 8, and probability level 0.05 [42]. Totally, considering the possibility of participants with missing data, 118 older adults with multiple chronic conditions completed the questionnaires.

Variables & data measurement

Demographic and health information

Patient demographic and health information was collected through self-report using a questionnaire with items on age, gender, marital status, education, number of medication, and number of chronic conditions. Age was used as a continuous variable. For the marital status, four categories including unmarried, married, divorced, and widowed were considered, and after data collection, based on frequency in each category, some categories were merged and information was presented in two categories: single (including unmarried, divorced, and widowed), and married. Education was recorded, and partitioned into three categories: high (above diploma and higher education), intermediate (diploma) and low level (illiterate or under diploma).

Cognition

Cognition was assessed by the Persian version of an abbreviated mental test (AMT). AMT contains 10 items which measure level of cognitive impairment. Each correct answer is scored on 0 or 1. The range of scores on this scale is between 0 and 10 [43]. The translation, validity, and reliability of the abbreviated cognition test in Iran was done by Bakhtiyari et al. (2014) [44]. The discriminant validity of AMT was appropriate for distinguishing individuals with and without cognitive impairment. Also, the sensitivity and specificity based on the diagnostic and statistical guide criteria of mental disorders were 64.9% and 64%, respectively, with a cut-off point of 7. The external reliability of the AMT was good (intergroup correlation coefficient = 0.89) and its internal reliability was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.76) [44]. In the study sample, the internal consistency reliability of this index was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.87).

Depression

Depression was measured by the Persian version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). This self-report scale contains 15 questions with yes or no response options. Each item is scored 0 or 1. The total scale score is derived, after reverse coding negatively worded items, by summing the response of the questions and can range between 0 and 15; a higher score indicates a higher level of depression [45, 46]. The translation, validity, and reliability of this questionnaire in Iran was done by Malakouti et al. (2006) [46]. In this study, the validity of the geriatric depression scale was investigated using factor analysis and criterion validity. The correlation coefficient for the 15-question form of GDS was 0.35 and 0.4 and for the 11-question form of GDS, 0.37 and 0.42 (P < 0.001). Also, sensitivity and specificity of 0.9 and 0.84 were calculated for GDS. Cronbach’s alpha, split-half, and test-retest coefficients for GDS were reported as 0.9, 0.85 and 0.85, respectively [46]. Internal consistency of GDS was acceptable in the study sample (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88).

BADL

Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) was measured by the Persian version of the Katz Index of Independence in Basic Activities of Daily Living. With this Index, clients are scored yes (scored 1)/no (scored 0) for independence in each of six functions: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. A score of 6 indicates full function, 4 indicates moderate impairment, and 2 or less indicates severe functional impairment [47, 48]. The translation, validity, and reliability of this questionnaire in Iran was done by Azad et al. (2006) [48]. This scale demonstrated favorable construct validity with acceptable correlations with similar conceptual scales. A high to excellent correlation was found between Katz’s index of basic activities of daily living and components of movement (P = 0.88), self-care (P = 0.98), and total scores (P = 0.92) of the Barthel index. Also, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Persian Katz index was acceptable (respectively, ICC = 0.83, ICC = 2.1, ICC = 0.93, ICC = 1.93). In an Iranian sample, the Internal consistency of this index was high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79) [48]. In this study, the internal consistency of this index was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.85).

IADL

Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) was measured by the Persian version of the Lawton IADL scale. The scale contains 8 items that assess a person’s ability to perform 8 activities: using a telephone, shop, preparing a meal, performing housekeeping, doing laundry, using transportation, and managing medications and money. Each item is scored either 0 (lower ability) or 1 (higher ability), while the total score is 8 that indicates a complete independent functioning [49, 50]. The translation, validity, and reliability of this questionnaire in Iran was done by Hassani Mehraban et al. (2014) [51]. This scale demonstrated favorable construct validity with acceptable correlations with similar conceptual scales. The experts’ agreement on the questions was calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis table of agreement, and the χ2 values were 19.022427. The experts’ agreement indicated the content validity of all the questions (P < 0.05). To check inter-rater reliability, the total correlation of the test between the first and second raters (using ICC) was also very high (P < 0.001, r = 0.961), which indicates the high reliability of the test in an Iranian samples [51]. In this study sample, the internal consistency of the index was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81).

Ethical considerations

After obtaining ethics permission from the university’s ethics committee (ethics code: IR.MODARES.REC.1401.108), the researcher was introduced to the research unit in a written and official manner by letter of introduction from the University of Medical Sciences. The objectives of the research were explained to the research unit and the study was conducted on those units that chose to participate in the study. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the research unit. At first, the nurses working in the unit introduced the study to patients and got their permission to have the researcher talk to them about the study in more detail and provide more details about the study and its goals, and their rights as research participants.

Data analysis

SPSS version 18 software [52] was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and percentage for qualitative variables, were utilized. To check the normality of the quantitative variables of the study, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used, which confirmed the normality of the data. Univariate linear regression analysis was used to identify a factor that may be a significant predictor for BADL and IADL. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify a set of predictors that may be significant predictors for BADL and IADL. By using multiple linear regression analysis, the impact of a set of independent variables on the dependent variables is investigated synchronously. In this study, the impact of each factor for predicting BADL and IADL was investigated by using univariate linear regression analysis, and also the impact of a set of factors (age, gender, marital status, education, number of chronic diseases, and depression) for predicting BADL and IADL by using multiple linear regression analysis. The tolerance and variance inflation factor (VIF) tests were used for the possibility of multicollinearity of the independent (predictor) variables. According to Menard (1955) [53], a tolerance value of less than 0.1 constitutes a certain and serious collinearity problem. Also, Myers (1990) [54] indicated that a VIF value of greater than 10 must call for a concern. The confidence interval in this study was set at 0.95. The significance level in all tests was 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

In this study, 118 older adults with multiple chronic conditions participated, the majority of whom were women (59.3%) and married (63.9%). The participants ranged in age from 61 to 92 years with a median age of 68 years. The median number of chronic conditions was 3. 26 (22%) of participants had at least 2 chronic conditions, and 1(0.8%) of participants had at most 6 chronic conditions, of which high blood pressure (83.1%), diabetes (63.6%), and respiratory diseases (68.6%) were the most common. The minimum and maximum number of medications in patients participating in the study were 3 and 14. Polypharmacy (using five or more medications) was found in 189% (n = 106) of older adult patients participating in the study. Other details are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and health information of participants (N = 118)
Full size table

The average cognitive score of participants was 9.38(0.78), which indicates that all of participants had normal cognitive status. The average depression score of participants was 10.68(2.58), which indicates that they were depressed. The average score of BADL and IADL was 2.62(1.57) and 1.40(1.06), respectively. Also, the median of BADL and IADL was 2 and 1, respectively. More than half of older adults had an BADL (50.9%) and IADL (70%) score of 2 and below, which indicates that they are dependent in performing BADL and IADL.

The analysis of multicollinearity

The tolerance and variance inflation factor (VIF) tests were used for the possibility of multicollinearity of the independent (predictor) variables. Tables 2 and 3 showed that all of the tolerance levels are above 0.1 and also, the VIF values are below 10. Therefore, multicollinearity is not a problematic issue or concern for this study (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 Correlation coefficient matrix for the possibility of multicollinearity of the independent (predictor) variables for BADL
Full size table
Table 3 Correlation coefficient matrix for the possibility of multicollinearity of the independent (predictor) variables for IADL
Full size table

Predictors of BADL

Based on the results of univariate linear regression analysis, age (B=-0.09, P < 0.001), gender (B = 0.98, P = 0.001), marital status (B=-0.69, P = 0.02), numbers of chronic conditions (B=-0.5, P = 0.001), depression (B=-0.18, P = 0.001) and IADL (B = 0.52, P < 0.001) were significant predictors for BADL. Based on the results of the multiple regression analysis, age (B=-0.04, P = 0.04), depression (B=-0.12, P = 0.04), and IADL (B = 0.46, P < 0.001) were significant predictors for BADL. The R-squared value of 0.39 indicates that the independent variables included in the regression model, explained 39% of the variance in BADL. Other details are provided in Table 4.

Table 4 Predictors of BADL using univariate and multiple regression analysis
Full size table

Predictors of IADL

Based on the results of the univariate regression analysis, age (B= -0.1, P < 0.001), gender (B = 1.07, P < 0.001), marital status (B=-1.04, P = 0.001), numbers of chronic conditions (B=-0.82, P < 0.001), depression (B=-0.17, P = 0.003), and BADL (B = 0.58, P < 0.001) were significant predictors for IADL. Based on the results of the multiple regression analysis, marital status (B=-0.51, P = 0.05), numbers of chronic condition (B=-0.61, P = 0.002), and BADL (B = 0.46, P < 0.001) were significant predictor for IADL. The R-squared value of 0.45 indicates that the independent variables included in the regression model, explained 45% of the variance in IADL. Other details are provided in Table 5.

Table 5 Predictors of IADL using univariate and multiple regression analysis
Full size table

Discussion

The present study was conducted to determine the predictors of functional status in Iranian older adults with multiple chronic conditions. The results of this study showed that functional status of most Iranian older adults with multiple chronic conditions was impaired. Consistent with the results of this study, the functional status impairments in older adults ranged from about 20–46% in other studies [14, 19, 55,56,57,58,59], which results indicate relatively high functional status impairments in older adults. Although the results of the mentioned studies [14, 55,56,57,58,59] were in line with the results of this study, the impairments related to IADL in the population of this study was higher than in prior studies [14, 55,56,57,58,59]. Among the possible reasons for the difference between the results of this current study with those of prior studies, it is possible that the provision of healthcare, welfare, and social services in Iran are not sufficient for older adults, and Iran has faced many challenges in reaching active aging for older adults. Geriatric policies in Iran have been general and vague, while the well-being of older adults was reported to be inadequate in most of Iran’s provinces. Also, some environmental obstacles, including poor street conditions, access problems and distance to health services facilities, noise, heavy traffic, dangerous intersections, poor lighting, and cyclists on the road, may limit mobility and reduce the sense of security in older adults [60, 61]. In addition, older adults in this study had multiple chronic conditions, while other mentioned studies did not specifically focus on this population. It is possible that the cumulative burden of disease caused by the simultaneous occurrence of two or more chronic conditions may be more important than the effect of each specific disease individually, and this may lead to greater disability. On the other hand, inconsistent with the findings of this study and other aforementioned studies, in another study [62], functional disability (BADL and IADL) was reported at a low level in older adults. Among the possible reasons for the difference in the results, in a prior study [62], hospitalized and critically ill older adults were excluded from the study, while in this study and other aforementioned studies [14, 55,56,57,58,59], this exclusion criterion was not taken into consideration. It seems that suffering from multiple chronic conditions in older adults can threaten their independence in performing daily and instrumental activities of living and make them more functionally dependent.

In this study, it was found that age significantly predicts functional status in terms of BADL in older adults with multiple chronic conditions; this finding concurs with the those of other studies [55, 59, 63]. Therefore, it seems that with increasing age can predict functional status especially performing BADL.

In this study, depression significantly predicted functional status in terms of BADL in older adults with multiple chronic conditions which concurs with the findings of another study [64]. Another study showed that early symptoms of major depression were associated with a greater likelihood of subsequent decline in higher-level BADL compared to individuals without major depressive symptoms [65]. Depression, especially chronic and long-term depression, can damage the brain and lead to a decrease in function [66].

In this study, marital status significantly predicted IADL. Specifically, single older adults were more likely to have functional impairment in terms of performing ADL than married older adults. In line with this result in this study, it was reported in the study of Gupta et al. (2014) that functional disability was significantly significant in single or unmarried people [67]. Another study found that functional disability was significantly more seen in those participants who were widowed or separated from their spouses compared to married older adults [68].

In this study, it was found that the number of chronic diseases can predict functional status in terms of IADL in older adults with multiple chronic conditions significantly. In line with this finding in this study, it was shown in another study that older adults with chronic disease had more functional disability than older adults without chronic disease [68]. Another study reported that BADL was associated with having no chronic or disabling disease [69]. It seems that a higher number of diseases, medications and other related treatments often lead to reduced quality of life and social isolation, resulting in functional status [68].

According to the results, BADL and IADL were significant predictors for each other: IADL can predict status on performing BADL and vice versa. Consistent with the results in this study, another study [70] reported that status on IADL was the strongest predictor of BADL and vice versa. In other studies, researchers have also pointed out the significant correlation between these two concepts [71, 72]. BADL includes activities necessary for independent self-care. In contrast, IADL refers to the abilities required for an independent interaction with the environment [70]. The decline in IADL usually precedes BADL limitations and thus may serve as a predictor of future BADL decline. Conversely, autonomy in BADL serves as a precondition for autonomy in terms of IADL. Therefore, according to the results of this study and other mentioned studies, probably status on BADL/IADL can serve as a prerequisite for another related concept.

Implications

According to the results, it seems that a comprehensive assessment of the demographic characteristics of older adults including age, gender, as well as their health conditions such as the number of chronic conditions and mental health, and more specifically their depression status can be useful for predicting the functional status of older adults. Therefore, the results showed that geriatric assessment should integrate physical and mental health care. Also, according to the results, it seems that healthcare providers can prevent or reduce functional status impairment in older adults and improve their functional status by addressing modifiable factors including number of chronic conditions and depression. In this regard, it is suggested that policymakers and health managers provide the necessary infrastructure to plan and implement interventions such as using strategies to improve mental health and lifestyle to prevent or improve depression and chronic conditions so that older adults are less at risk of functional impairment. For future studies, it is suggested to conduct the study with probability sampling. It is also suggested that researchers conduct studies among older adult populations in other different parts of Iran so that they can more accurately identify the predictors of functional status in older adults according to their specific conditions and characteristics and then adopt more effective strategies to improve it.

Limitations

The limitation of this study is that it was conducted in the north of Iran, so its results may not be generalizable to all areas of Iran. Also, convenience sampling can limit generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion

According to the results, older adults with multiple chronic conditions who are older, single (unmarried, divorced, widow), with a higher number of chronic conditions and depression are more at risk of impaired functional status. Therefore, this study shows the importance of the effects of demographic and health characteristics including age, gender, number of chronic conditions, and depression on the ability to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living in older adults with multiple chronic conditions. These findings can play an important role in preventing functional status impairments or improving the functional status among older adults with chronic conditions. Nurses and other healthcare providers can use the results of this study to identify high-risk older adults.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BADL:

Basic Activities of Daily Living

IADL:

Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

References

  1. Guo J, Huang X, Dou L, Yan M, Shen T, Tang W, et al. Aging and aging-related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Therapy. 2022;7(1):391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196–208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L, Shooshtari S, St John P, Menec VH. Multimorbidity and depressive symptoms in older adults and the role of social support: evidence using Canadian longitudinal study on aging (CLSA) data. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(11):e0276279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Emamgholipour S. The burden of elderly’s non-communicable diseases in Iran. Evid Based Health Policy Manage Econ. 2017;1(3):128–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kingston A, Robinson L, Booth H, Knapp M, Jagger C. Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: estimates from the population ageing and care simulation (PACSim) model. Age Ageing. 2018;47(3):374–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearson-Stuttard J, Ezzati M, Gregg EW. Multimorbidity—a defining challenge for health systems. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(12):e599–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, Heinrich S, Corrieri S, Luppa M, et al. Health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(4):387–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Castro-de-Araujo LFS, Rodrigues EDS, Machado DB, Henriques CMP, Verotti MP, Gonçalves AQ, et al. Multimorbidity worsened anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. J Affect Disord. 2022;314:86–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jafari H, Ghasemi-Semeskandeh D, Goudarzian AH, Heidari T, Jafari-Koulaee A. Depression in the Iranian elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Aging Res. 2021;2021:9305624.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Makovski TT, Schmitz S, Zeegers MP, Stranges S, van den Akker M. Multimorbidity and quality of life: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2019;53:100903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffith L, Raina P, Wu H, Zhu B, Stathokostas L. Population attributable risk for functional disability associated with chronic conditions in Canadian older adults. Age Ageing. 2010;39(6):738–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garin N, Olaya B, Moneta MV, Miret M, Lobo A, Ayuso-Mateos JL, et al. Impact of multimorbidity on disability and quality of life in the Spanish older population. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiao Y, Liu S, Li G, Lu Y, Wu Y, Shen Y, et al. Longitudinal follow-up studies on the bidirectional association between ADL/IADL disability and multimorbidity: results from two national sample cohorts of middle-aged and elderly adults. Gerontology. 2021;67(5):563–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Storeng SH, Vinjerui KH, Sund ER, Krokstad S. Associations between complex multimorbidity, activities of daily living and mortality among older norwegians. A prospective cohort study: the HUNT Study, Norway. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Su P, Ding H, Zhang W, Duan G, Yang Y, Chen R, et al. The association of multimorbidity and disability in a community-based sample of elderly aged 80 or older in Shanghai, China. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Patrizio E, Calvani R, Marzetti E, Cesari M. Physical functional assessment in older adults. J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(2):141–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yildiz NG, Aydin HZ, Aydin K. Nationwide study of basic and instrumental activities of daily living in individuals aged 65 + living at home. Int J Disabil Sports Health Sci. 2023;6(Special Issue 1–Healthy Life, Sports for Disabled people):330–40.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alhalafi A, Al-Amoud M, Aldahman R, Abd-Ellatif E, Omar D. The prevalence of functional disability and associated factors among older people attending primary health-care centers in Riyadh City. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci. 2021;9(B):975–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosseini S, Zabihi A, Jafarian Amiri S, Bijani A. The relationship between chronic diseases and disability in daily activities and instrumental activities of daily living in the elderly. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2018;20(5):23–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heshmati B, Joulaei H. Iran’s health-care system in transition. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):29–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bryła M, Burzyńska M, Maniecka-Bryła I. Self-rated quality of life of city-dwelling elderly people benefitting from social help: results of a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zadeh NS, Akbari F, Khouzani PK, Zavare ASN. Comparative study of elderly care services among Iran, United States of America, and Sweden. 2018.

  24. Abbasian M. Structures of the ageing health services provision in the world and conceptualization of an integrated model for Iran. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, School of Health; 2017.

  25. Amiri MM, Tavana AM. Successful implementation of general health policies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: barriers and mechanisms. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(12):1127–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grumbach K. Chronic illness, comorbidities, and the need for medical generalism. Annals Family Med. 2003;1(1):4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leonardi M, Lee H, Kostanjsek N, Fornari A, Raggi A, Martinuzzi A, et al. 20 years of ICF—international classification of functioning, disability and health: uses and applications around the world. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18):11321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Organization WH. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: children & youth version. ICF-CY: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chauhan S, Kumar S, Bharti R, Patel R. Prevalence and determinants of activity of daily living and instrumental activity of daily living among elderly in India. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Schon P, Kareholt I, Thorslund M, Parker M, editors. Gender differences in the associations between ADL and other health indicators in 1992 and 2002. Gerontologist; 2009: Gerontological Soc Amer 1030 15TH ST NW, STE 250, Washington, DC 20005202.

  31. Oksuzyan A, Brønnum-Hansen H, Jeune B. Gender gap in health expectancy. Springer; 2010. pp. 213–8.

  32. Denton M, Prus S, Walters V. Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(12):2585–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu P, Adler NE, Goldman N, Weinstein M, Seeman TE. Relationship between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(3):483–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pandey KR, Yang F, Cagney KA, Smieliauskas F, Meltzer DO, Ruhnke GW. The impact of marital status on health care utilization among medicare beneficiaries. Medicine. 2019;98(12).

  35. Srivastava S, Anwar T, Patel R, Chauhan S. Dynamics of chronic diseases in metro and non-metro regions of India: evidence from India human development survey I and II. Int J. 2020;6(8):322.

    Google Scholar 

  36. de la Rica-Escuín M, González-Vaca J, Varela-Pérez R, Arjonilla-García MD, Silva-Iglesias M, Oliver-Carbonell JL, et al. Frailty and mortality or incident disability in institutionalized older adults: the FINAL study. Maturitas. 2014;78(4):329–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ralph NL, Mielenz TJ, Parton H, Flatley A-M, Thorpe LE. Peer reviewed: multiple chronic conditions and limitations in activities of daily living in a community-based sample of older adults in New York City, 2009. Preventing chronic disease. 2013;10.

  38. Katsimpris A, Linseisen J, Meisinger C, Volaklis K. The association between polypharmacy and physical function in older adults: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:1865–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(14):2101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Katon J. Epidemiology and treatment of depression in patients with chronic medical illness. Dialog Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(1):7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lefèvre T, d’Ivernois J-F, De Andrade V, Crozet C, Lombrail P, Gagnayre R. What do we mean by multimorbidity? An analysis of the literature on multimorbidity measures, associated factors, and impact on health services organization. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2014;62(5):305–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Soper D. A-priori sample size calculator for multiple regression [Software]. 2014. Available form https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc. 2018.

  43. Piotrowicz K, Romanik W, Skalska A, Gryglewska B, Szczerbińska K, Derejczyk J, et al. The comparison of the 1972 Hodkinson’s abbreviated mental test score (AMTS) and its variants in screening for cognitive impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(4):561–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bakhtiyari F, Foroughan M, Fakhrzadeh H, Nazari N, Najafi B, Alizadeh M, et al. Validation of the Persian version of abbreviated mental test (AMT) in elderly residents of Kahrizak Charity Foundation. Iran J Diabetes Lipid Disorders. 2014;13(6):487–94.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Malakouti K, Fathollahi P, Mirabzadeh A, Salavati M, Kahani S. Validation of geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) in Iran. Res Med. 2006;30(4):361–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wallace M, Shelkey M. Katz index of independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Urol Nurs. 2007;27(1):93–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Azad A, Mohammadinezhad T, Taghizadeh G, Lajevardi L. Clinical assessment of activities of daily living in acute stroke: validation of the Persian version of Katz index. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3Part1):179–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mirzadeh FS, Alizadeh-Khoei M, Sharifi F, Aminaloroaya R, Hormozi S, Fakhrzadeh H. Validity and reliability: the Iranian version of Lawton IADL in elderly community dwellers. J Public Mental Health. 2020;19(3):241–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mehraban AH, Soltanmohamadi Y, Akbarfahimi M, Taghizadeh G. Validity and reliability of the persian version of lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale in patients with dementia. Med J Islamic Repub Iran. 2014;28:25.

    Google Scholar 

  52. IBM C. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp. 2012.

  53. Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage; 2002.

  54. Myers RH, Myers RH. Classical and modern regression with applications. Duxbury press Belmont, CA; 1990.

  55. Connolly D, Garvey J, McKee G. Factors associated with ADL/IADL disability in community dwelling older adults in the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA). Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(8):809–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Herman R, Akhriani HN. Determinants activity of daily living (ADL) elderly tresna werdha nursing home (PSTW) special region of Yogyakarta. Jump Health. 2018;2(1):81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Millán-Calenti JC, Tubío J, Pita-Fernández S, González-Abraldes I, Lorenzo T, Fernández-Arruty T, et al. Prevalence of functional disability in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and associated factors, as predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50(3):306–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tuyet PA, Huyen NTT, Long PN, Bich PTN, Toan TK. ADL/IADL limitations and related factors in older adults in 3 northern provinces Vietnam. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học. 2023;166(5E12):50–60.

  59. Ćwirlej-Sozańska A, Wiśniowska-Szurlej A, Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska A, Sozański B. Determinants of ADL and IADL disability in older adults in southeastern Poland. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rantakokko M, Portegijs E, Viljanen A, Iwarsson S, Rantanen T. Mobility modification alleviates environmental influence on incident mobility difficulty among community-dwelling older people: a two-year follow-up study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0154396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Rantakokko M, Mänty M, Iwarsson S, Törmäkangas T, Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, et al. Fear of moving outdoors and development of outdoor walking difficulty in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(4):634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Suyasa IGPD, Sutini NK, Kamaryati NP, Nuryanto IK. Determinant of functional disability in instrumental activities of daily living among elderly living in a rural area in Bali: a cross-sectional study.

  63. Wahyuni S, Effendy C, Kusumaningrum FM, Dewi FST. Factors associated with independence for elderly people in their activities of daily living. Jurnal Berkala Epidemiologi. 2021;9(1):44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao L, Wang J, Deng H, Chen J, Ding D. Depressive symptoms and ADL/IADL disabilities among older adults from low-income families in dalian, liaoning. Clinical interventions in aging. 2022:733–43.

  65. Kazama M, Kondo N, Suzuki K, Minai J, Imai H, Yamagata Z. Early impact of depression symptoms on the decline in activities of daily living among older Japanese: Y-HALE cohort study. Environ Health Prev Med. 2011;16(3):196–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zuckerman H, Pan Z, Park C, Brietzke E, Musial N, Shariq AS, et al. Recognition and treatment of cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Gupta P, Mani K, Rai SK, Nongkynrih B, Gupta SK. Functional disability among elderly persons in a rural area of Haryana. Indian J Public Health. 2014;58(1):11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Vaish K, Patra S, Chhabra P. Functional disability among elderly: a community-based cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(1):253–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Redzovic S, Vereijken B, Bonsaksen T. Aging at home: factors associated with independence in activities of daily living among older adults in Norway-a HUNT study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1215417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Beltz S, Gloystein S, Litschko T, Laag S, van den Berg N. Multivariate analysis of independent determinants of ADL/IADL and quality of life in the elderly. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Candela F, Zucchetti G, Ortega E, Rabaglietti E, Magistro D. Preventing loss of basic activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living in elderly. Holist Nurs Pract. 2015;29(5):313–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Baltes MM, Mayr U, Borchelt M, Maas I, Wilms H-U. Everyday competence in old and very old age: an inter-disciplinary perspective. Ageing Soc. 1993;13(4):657–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is derived from a part of the nursing PhD dissertation project of Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University. The authors would like to thank Research and Technology Deputy of Tarbiat Modares University for all supports. The authors also appreciate the older adults who participated in this study.

Funding

No special funds and grants were received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Azar Jafari-Koulaee & Eesa Mohammadi

  2. School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, York University Centre for Aging Research and Education, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Mary T. Fox

  3. Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Aliakbar Rasekhi

  4. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

    Ozra Akha

Authors
  1. Azar Jafari-Koulaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eesa Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary T. Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aliakbar Rasekhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ozra Akha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AJ-K: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. MF: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AR: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. OA: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eesa Mohammadi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research project protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Tarbiat Modares University (Ethics code: IR.MODARES.REC.1401.108) and the place where the research was conducted and complies with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (revised in Tokyo 2004). Also, informed consent was obtained from all participants in this research and their anonymity was maintained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jafari-Koulaee, A., Mohammadi, E., Fox, M.T. et al. Predictors of basic and instrumental activities of daily living among older adults with multiple chronic conditions. BMC Geriatr 24, 383 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04947-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04947-w

Keywords

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

Contact us