Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Age and gender differences in the association between social participation and instrumental activities of daily living among community-dwelling elderly

BMC GeriatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:99

DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0491-7

Received: 16 January 2017

Accepted: 20 April 2017

Published: 28 April 2017

Abstract

Background

Although many studies have suggested social participation (SP) has beneficial effects on elderly people’s health, most of them failed to deal with paid work. Additionally, few studies have focused on the age effect between SP and older people’s health. To investigate whether the association between SP, including paid work, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), exhibits not only in gender, but also in age among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

In 2014, we distributed self-administered questionnaires to all community-dwelling elderly aged ≥65 in two medium-sized cities in Nara Prefecture, Japan (n = 32,825). 22,845 residents submitted the questionnaire (response rate, 69.6%). Analyzed subjects were limited to 17,680 persons who had neither dependency in basic ADL nor missing data for required items. SP was assessed based on participation frequency in seven types of social activities: volunteer groups, sports groups, hobby groups, cultural groups, senior citizens’ clubs, neighborhood community associations, and paid work. Using Poisson regression models, prevalence ratio for poor IADL was calculated. To examine age and gender differences in the association between SP and IADL, we performed stratified analyses by age and gender group; male young-old (aged 65–74), male old-old (aged ≥75), female young-old, and female old-old.

Results

Prevalence of those with poor IADL was 17.1% in males and 4.5% in females, showing a significant gender difference. After adjustment for relevant covariates, volunteer groups were inversely associated with poor IADL only in males and the relationship was stronger in the old-old group than in the young-old group. Conversely, only females had a significant inverse association between paid work and poor IADL, and the association was not reliant on their ages but only those who participated infrequently had a favorable effect. Influence of age in the beneficial association between SP and IADL was generally larger in the old-old group than in the young-old group, but hobby groups were inversely associated with poor IADL, regardless of age, gender, and frequency.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that SP in older age is positively associated with IADL, however, the association seems to differ depending on the type of activities participated in, the participants’ gender, and their age.

Keywords

Social participation Instrumental activities of daily living Paid work Elderly Age differences Gender differences

Background

Elderly people’s social participation (SP) is believed to be a vital key in their active aging [1]. Many previous studies have reported that elderly people’s SP has a positive impact on their physical and mental health including longevity [2, 3], sustention of ADL [2, 4] and cognitive function [5, 6], higher level of health-related quality of life [7], and prevention of depression [8]. On the other hand, it has been pointed out that SP’s impact on elderly people’s health may change depending on its content [2, 3, 9] and the type of activities participated in [46]. Frequent SP can make the elderly feel obligated and may have a negative impact on their health [10, 11]. These issues suggest that rather than trying to grasp the health impact of all SP activities on elderly people’s health in a comprehensive manner, it is necessary to pay attention to the type of SP and the frequency of participation.

To spend everyday community life in an autonomous and active manner, elderly people require a higher level of living function than they need to conduct basic activities of daily living (BADL), the ability required to live autonomously while taking care of one’s self [12]. One of the indexes of higher living function is instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), which is having the ability to use public transportation, prepare meals, shop, and manage their own finances [12]. Because it’s noted that there are gender differences in IADL difficulties among older adults [13], it is necessary to examine male and female IADL separately when viewing it as a health outcome. Since there are limited numbers of studies regarding the association between SP and IADL, we examined the types of social activities which community dwelling elderly people participate in as well as the impact of SP on IADL with specific attention given to gender difference [14, 15]. Their results were as follows; a prospective cohort study [14] revealed that among females, participation in volunteer groups, hobby groups, senior citizen clubs, and local events was associated with decreased risk of IADL decline, whereas among males, only participation in hobby groups was protective for IADL decline. A cross-sectional study [15] revealed that among females, a significant inverse association between frequent participation and poor IADL was observed for all types of social groups, whereas among males, the association was limited to sports groups and senior citizens’ clubs. These observed results revealed that females received a stronger impact from SP than males as well as social activities showing that significant relationships with IADL are different on each gender.

Prior studies have pointed out that the elderly receive a greater impact from SP on health than younger individuals, and that risk and protective factors for functional decline differ between the younger-old and the older-old [16]. Although there are several studies regarding SP of community dwelling elderly people with focus given to gender differences [2, 6, 8, 9], there are very few studies giving attention to the impact of age at the time of SP [5]. In our previous studies, too, age was only used as a covariate [14, 15]. As the rate of those who participate in social activities and those who maintain IADL decrease along with aging [17, 18], we consider the examination of age difference in association between SP and IADL to be essential. Furthermore, our previous studies [14, 15] didn’t consider “paid work” as one of the most important SPs for elderly people [1, 19]. In countries like Japan, where an aging population combined with a diminishing number of children is progressing, employment of the elderly is an important issue in securing manpower [20]. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the relationship between IADL, which is one of the indexes of healthy longevity, and the elderly population’s paid work on each gender and age group.

In this study, based on the questionnaire data collected from all community dwelling elderly people, the researchers try to reveal how types and frequencies of SP, including paid work, impact the IADL of different genders and age groups.

Methods

Study population

The field of this survey’s participants is two medium-sized cities in Nara Prefecture, Japan. Both cities are located in the mid-west part of Nara Prefecture and have developed as residential areas as they share a border with a major urban area, Osaka Prefecture. Table 1 shows the basic information of both cities. Compared to the population aging rate in Japan, 26.0% as of October 2014, one can say A City’s population aging rate is similar, but that B City’s is lower. In March 2014, questionnaires were sent to all community-dwelling elderly aged 65 and over (n = 32,825, except those living in nursing homes) and collected by regular mail.
Table 1

Basic information on the surveyed municipalities

 

A City

B City

Total population as of October 2014

68,168

78,273

Population density as of October 2014 (person/km2)

4136.4

3226.4

Population aging rate as of October 2014

26.7%

20.6%

No. of distributed questionnaires

17,615

15,210

No. of submitted questionnaires

11,870

10,975

Response rate

67.4%

72.2%

No. of subjects with dependent BADL

1949

1565

No. of subjects with missing data on BADL, IADL, and/or SP

984

667

No. of analytical subjects

8937

8743

Age of analytical subjects (mean, median, range)

72.9, 72.0, 65–98

72.9, 72.0, 65–100

Male prevalence of analytical subjects

45.7%

47.6%

BADL basic activities of daily living, IADL instrumental activities of daily living, SP social participation

All study participants provided signed informed consent. This study protocol was approved by the Nara Medical University Ethics Committee (approval number 990).

Assessment of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)

The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence (TMIG-IC) [21] was used to evaluate IADL. TMIG-IC (see Additional file 1) is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate aged people’s higher-level functional capacity and is comprised of 3 subscales. One of the subscales, IADL, is comprised of 5 items. When a respondent replies that they can independently conduct all 5 items, we determined the person to be IADL self-dependent. Those ones who claimed they couldn’t conduct any of the items were determined to have poor IADL [22].

Assessment of social participation (SP)

Besides the six types used in a previous study [15] (i.e., volunteer groups, sports groups, hobby groups, cultural groups, senior citizens’ clubs, and neighborhood community associations), paid work was adopted. We requested subjects to select a degree of participation frequency on each of seven types of SP from “4 times or more per week,” “2 to 3 times per week,” “once a week (i.e., weekly),” “several times per month (i.e., monthly),” “several times per year (i.e., yearly),” and “not participating”. See Additional file 2 for the analysis of responses regarding the frequency of participation in each SP. We set the participation frequency of those who belong to social groups to be “frequent participants” if they participated weekly or more and “infrequent participants” if they participated monthly or less, which divided the participants roughly in half. However, there were very few “weekly or more” responses for senior citizens’ clubs, a majority of participants in neighborhood community associations attended the activities yearly, and the majority of those who attended paid work participated 4 times or more per week. Additionally, there were no participants with poor IADL who participated in senior citizens’ clubs weekly or more among females aged 65–74, in neighborhood community associations weekly or more among both females aged 65–74 and females aged 75 over, and in paid work monthly or less among females aged 65–74 (see Additional file 3). Therefore, we adjusted the participation frequencies definitions for those 3 activities. Regarding senior citizens’ clubs and neighborhood community associations, participating monthly or more was defined as frequent participation and yearly was defined as infrequent participation. Regarding paid work, participating 4 times or more per week was defined as frequent participation, while 3 times or less per week was defined as infrequent participation.

Covariates

Based on prior studies [49, 14, 15, 2325], the following variables were used as covariates that may mediate the association between SP and IADL: age, residential area, marital status, subjective economic situations, pensions, chronic diseases, body mass index (BMI), alcohol, smoking, dietary habit, depression, cognitive function, self-rated health, and having a purpose in life. Data on age and residential areas were provided by city governments, and data for other covariates were procured from the questionnaire.

Regarding chronic diseases, the authors requested respondents to reveal the diseases they were under treatment for. Diseases disclosed include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, digestive system disease, urogenital disease, musculoskeletal disorders, otological disease, and ophthalmologic disease. The prevalence of each disease is shown in Additional file 4. The top 3 diseases in prevalence (i.e., hypertension, ophthalmologic disease, and musculoskeletal disorders) were identified as prevalent comorbidities in community-dwelling elderly, and used as indicators of chronic diseases. Depression was assessed using the 5-item short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale [26] (score range 0–5), and a score of ≥2 was judged as having depression. Cognitive function was assessed using the Cognitive Performance Scale [27] (score range 0–6), and a score of ≥1 was classified as poor cognitive function. Self-rated health and having a purpose in life were evaluated to assess quality of life. Self-rated health was assessed by asking a single question “How is your health in general? Is it very good, good, poor, or very poor?” Having a purpose in life was also assessed by asking a single question “Do you have a sense of purpose in life? Yes or no?” Prior studies have used self-rated health and a sense of purpose in life as assessments of quality of life of the elderly, and reported that both are associated with a decline in IADL among community-dwelling elderly [24, 25].

We set all covariates except age as dummy variables. According to the statistical recommendation for handling missing covariates [28], those with missing values were set as a missing category in each covariate. See Additional file 4 for the categories of each item and distribution of answers.

Statistical analyses

We conducted the sample size approximation using Epi Info version 7.2, and confirmed that our study population had an adequate design of needed sample size. The details of sample size approximation are provided in Additional file 5.

To investigate the association between SP and IADL, we used Poisson regression analysis with robust variance estimator. Prevalence ratio (PR) of SP for poor IADL was calculated with reference to those with non-participation in each activity, and with adjustment for all covariates. To examine age and gender differences in the association between SP and IADL, we performed stratified analyses by age and gender group; male young-old (aged 65–74), male old-old (aged ≥75), female young-old, and female old-old. The level of significance was 0.05 (two-tailed). We conducted statistical analyses using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.0.

Results

Figure 1 displays a flow chart of study participants. Among the target population (n = 32,825), 22,845 people returned the questionnaire, which makes the response rate 69.6%. See Additional file 6 for the basic attributes of those who submitted questionnaires. Responses showed a tendency that the higher the age, the lower the submission rate. Also, those who required higher nursing care needs were less likely to submit the questionnaire. There was no difference in the response rate between males and females. Disability in BADL does not only restrict SP but relates to limitations in IADL [12, 23], therefore, we eliminated 3514 respondents whom we determined were not self-reliant in BADL. We defined elderly people without BADL self-reliance as those who require nursing care under the public long-term care insurance system and/or those who answered that they needed assistance for at least one of the 5 activities listed on the questionnaire (eating, going to the toilet, bathing, dressing, and walking indoors). Additionally, we eliminated 1651 respondents who did not answer one or more questions regarding BADL, IADL and SP as being not analyzable. After eliminating 5165 respondents, the number of subjects included in the final analyses (hereinafter referred to as analyzed subjects) was 17,680 (8251 males and 9429 females). There were no age differences among analyzed subjects between the 2 cities (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.897), but B City’s rate of males was higher than that of A City (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.011) (shown in the bottom of Table 1). Regarding the prevalence of poor IADL, it was 17.1% in males and 4.5% in females, showing that males had a significantly poorer IADL than females (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.001).
Fig. 1

Flow chart of study participants. BADL basic activities of daily living, IADL instrumental activities of daily living

Table 2 shows the age-stratified characteristics of study participants. A prevalence of those who were not married, had more chronic diseases, were underweight, suffered from depression, had poor cognitive function, poor self-rated health, no sense of purpose in life, and poor IADL increased as they became older (Cochran-Armitage test, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the prevalence of those who had poor subjective economic situations, were daily drinker, and were current smokers decreased as they became older (Cochran-Armitage test, p < 0.001). Regarding SP, a prevalence of participants in sports groups, neighborhood community associations, and paid work decreased as they became older, while more people attended senior citizens’ clubs as they aged (Cochran-Armitage test, p < 0.001). Participation in volunteer groups and hobby groups was not affected by participants’ ages.
Table 2

Characteristics by age category among the study participants (n = 17,680)

 

65–68 years

69–71 years

72–76 years

77–100 years

P for trenda

(n = 4811)

(n = 3424)

(n = 4811)

(n = 4634)

Residential area: A City

50.1%

50.4%

50.7%

50.9%

0.409

Gender: males

45.7%

46.7%

47.9%

46.3%

0.413

Marital status: not married

19.3%

20.8%

24.8%

40.5%

<0.001

Subjective economic situations: poor

18.0%

17.9%

18.9%

14.2%

<0.001

Pensions: National pension

34.5%

36.4%

37.8%

37.6%

0.001

Presence of hypertension

34.8%

38.2%

40.8%

43.6%

<0.001

Presence of ophthalmologic disease

10.5%

14.5%

17.1%

20.2%

<0.001

Presence of musculoskeletal disorders

8.9%

10.6%

13.8%

18.9%

<0.001

Body mass index: underweight (<18.5)

6.0%

5.2%

6.1%

7.9%

<0.001

Alcohol intake: daily drinkers

25.3%

24.7%

21.5%

16.7%

<0.001

Smoking history: current smokers

14.0%

11.8%

10.1%

7.1%

<0.001

Frequency of meals: once or twice a day

7.5%

5.8%

6.0%

5.8%

0.002

Subjects with depression

17.7%

20.2%

24.8%

34.7%

<0.001

Subjects with poor cognitive function

9.7%

11.3%

16.1%

23.0%

<0.001

Subjects with poor self-rated health

13.8%

15.4%

17.9%

20.8%

<0.001

Subjects with no sense of purpose in life

10.7%

11.0%

11.2%

13.8%

<0.001

Subjects with poor IADL

7.7%

8.6%

10.6%

14.2%

<0.001

Engagement in volunteer groups

16.0%

20.1%

20.3%

16.9%

0.210

Engagement in sports groups

28.8%

29.7%

29.1%

21.7%

<0.001

Engagement in hobby groups

40.3%

45.6%

45.3%

38.7%

0.143

Engagement in cultural groups

15.4%

17.6%

18.0%

16.9%

0.035

Engagement in senior citizens’ clubs

5.9%

12.2%

18.6%

29.9%

<0.001

Engagement in neighborhood community associations

41.0%

42.8%

43.2%

36.4%

<0.001

Engagement in paid work

36.7%

25.6%

19.2%

9.4%

<0.001

aCochran-Armitage test

Table 3 shows the gender-stratified characteristics of study participants. Females were significantly higher than males in the categories of “not being married,” “receiving national pension,” “presence of ophthalmologic disease,” “presence of musculoskeletal disorders,” “being underweight,” “participating in hobby groups,” “participating in cultural groups,” and “participating in senior citizens’ clubs” (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.001). On the other hand, males were significantly higher than females in the categories of “daily drinkers,” “current smokers,” “eating less than 3 meals a day,” “having poor cognitive function,” “participating in volunteer groups,” “participating in sports groups,” “participating in neighborhood community associations,” and “participating in paid work” (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.001). Regarding age, subjective economic situations, hypertension, and sensing a purpose in life, there was no difference between genders.
Table 3

Characteristics by gender among study participants (n = 17,680)

 

Males

(n = 8251)

Females

(n = 9429)

P valuea

Age: 75 years or older

35.2%

35.1%

0.925

Residential area: A City

49.5%

51.4%

0.011

Marital status: not married

13.1%

38.5%

<0.001

Subjective economic situations: poor

17.2%

17.2%

0.984

Pensions: National pension

15.3%

47.2%

<0.001

Presence of hypertension

40.1%

38.8%

0.076

Presence of ophthalmologic disease

13.6%

17.4%

<0.001

Presence of musculoskeletal disorders

7.2%

18.5%

<0.001

Body mass index: underweight (<18.5)

4.5%

8.0%

<0.001

Alcohol intake: daily drinkers

40.3%

5.8%

<0.001

Smoking history: current smokers

18.5%

3.8%

<0.001

Frequency of meals: once or twice a day

7.2%

5.6%

<0.001

Subjects with depression

23.7%

25.3%

0.013

Subjects with poor cognitive function

17.9%

12.9%

<0.001

Subjects with poor self-rated health

18.0%

16.2%

0.001

Subjects with no sense of purpose in life

12.1%

11.4%

0.181

Engagement in volunteer groups

19.9%

16.7%

<0.001

Engagement in sports groups

29.2%

25.4%

<0.001

Engagement in hobby groups

40.7%

43.7%

<0.001

Engagement in cultural groups

13.0%

20.4%

<0.001

Engagement in senior citizens’ clubs

15.5%

18.1%

<0.001

Engagement in neighborhood community associations

44.2%

37.7%

<0.001

Engagement in paid work

30.7%

15.5%

<0.001

aFisher’s exact test

Table 4 shows the PR for poor IADL, stratified by age and gender group. Significant inverse association between volunteer groups and poor IADL was shown only in males and the impact was stronger on the old-old group than young-old group: among young-old males, the PRs of poor IADL were 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.60–0.91) for infrequent participation and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.72–1.25) for frequent participation, and old-old males, scored 0.65 (0.49–0.85) and 0.63 (0.43–0.93), respectively, compared to those with non-participation. By contrast, significant inverse association between paid work and poor IADL was shown only in females, and infrequent participation was the only category that showed a significant relationship in both young-old (PR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05–0.90) and old-old (0.14, 0.02–0.96). Hobby groups were inversely associated with poor IADL, regardless of age, gender, and frequency. Sports groups showed a greater favorable effect on old-old group than the young-old group for both males and females. For senior citizens’ clubs, only the old-old who participated frequently had a significant inverse association with poor IADL. The matters involved in both males and females but showed greater positive impacts on old-old female group were cultural groups and neighborhood community associations. Overall, frequent participation had a stronger effect on old-old than young-old and in females than males.
Table 4

Adjusted prevalence ratios for poor IADL associated with the type and frequency of social participation, stratified by age and gender (reference: non-participation of each activity)

 

Male young-old

Male old-old

Female young-old

Female old-old

 

(n = 5348)

(n = 2903)

(n = 6119)

(n = 3310)

 

PRa (95% CI)

PRa (95% CI)

PRa (95% CI)

PRa (95% CI)

Volunteer groups

 Infrequentb

0.76 (0.62–0.94) *

0.65 (0.50–0.86) **

0.53 (0.23–1.20)

0.81 (0.51–1.31)

 Frequentc

0.96 (0.73–1.27)

0.63 (0.43–0.94) *

0.40 (0.09–1.70)

0.71 (0.32–1.56)

Sports groups

   

 Infrequentb

0.76 (0.62–0.93) **

0.62 (0.44–0.86) **

0.14 (0.02–1.03)

0.14 (0.02–0.95) *

 Frequentc

0.85 (0.70–1.02)

0.71 (0.55–0.93) *

0.24 (0.10–0.59) **

0.32 (0.18–0.55) ***

Hobby groups

 Infrequentb

0.75 (0.64–0.87) ***

0.64 (0.51–0.80) ***

0.18 (0.08–0.41) ***

0.59 (0.41–0.84) **

 Frequentc

0.81 (0.67–0.98) *

0.70 (0.55–0.90) **

0.18 (0.08–0.42) ***

0.27 (0.16–0.47) ***

Cultural groups

 Infrequentb

0.76 (0.59–0.99) *

0.65 (0.48–0.89) **

0.07 (0.01–0.52) **

0.30 (0.17–0.55) ***

 Frequentc

0.83 (0.54–1.30)

0.85 (0.53–1.35)

0.36 (0.09–1.47)

0.20 (0.07–0.60) **

Senior citizens’ clubs

 Infrequentd

1.16 (0.91–1.47)

0.89 (0.69–1.14)

0.35 (0.09–1.41)

0.83 (0.59–1.18)

 Frequente

0.91 (0.67–1.25)

0.65 (0.49–0.86) **

0.56 (0.23–1.37)

0.52 (0.36–0.76) **

Neighborhood community associations

 Infrequentd

0.90 (0.78–1.02)

0.74 (0.62–0.88) **

0.40 (0.24–0.67) ***

0.62 (0.44–0.88) **

 Frequente

0.71 (0.56–0.90) **

0.76 (0.56–1.02)

0.46 (0.18–1.19)

0.47 (0.27–0.84) *

Paid work

 Infrequentf

1.01 (0.86–1.20)

0.96 (0.73–1.26)

0.21 (0.05–0.87) *

0.14 (0.02–0.99)*

 Frequentg

1.01 (0.86–1.18)

1.00 (0.74–1.35)

0.56 (0.23–1.36)

1.06 (0.46–2.46)

CI confidence interval, IADL instrumental activities of daily living, PR prevalence ratio

Young-old means aged 65–74, and old-old means aged 75 or over

Bold values highlight statistical significance

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001

aAdjusted for age, residential area, marital status, subjective economic situations, pensions, chronic diseases, body mass index, alcohol, smoking, dietary habit, depression, cognitive function, self-rated health, and sensing a purpose in life. bWeekly or more. cMonthly or less. dMonthly or more. eYearly. fFour times or more per week. gThree times or less per week

Discussion

From the overall tendency, preferable impact given to elderly people’s IADL from SP is stronger on females than males and the same can be said to those who are in the old-old category than the young-old category. Regarding the mechanism of this study’s results, please refer to previous studies regarding SP provides good impact on IADL, and females have stronger relationships with IADL than males [14, 15]. In this study, we solely report the mechanism based on the newly obtained results.

First, among only females, low frequency paid work showed a significant relationship with independent IADL. Some prior studies demonstrated that paid work in the elderly produced a good effect on physical functioning [19, 29]. Minami et al. reported that there is a relationship between continuation of paid work and maintenance of higher-level functional capacity [29]. However, the interpretation of the results in the Minami study requires careful attention because higher-level functional capacity includes social role, which is a similar concept to SP, and no analyses were conducted on each gender. In another study [19], working local dwelling elderly people showed a significant decrease to the risk of deteriorating BADL among males during their 8 years of follow-up period, though females had no association between paid work and BADL. The results of the Fujiwara study [19] are inconsistent with those of the present study. One reason is the difference of outcome indexes and in addition, because employment status in the Fujiwara study was evaluated 25 years ago, in 1991. Since then, systems of elderly employment and pension have drastically changed, and the public nursing-care insurance system has been introduced, so elderly people’s work environment and self-care may differ greatly between the time the former study was conducted in 1991 and our study was conducted in 2014. In a recent study [30], the researchers examined elderly people who visited local employment support center to find out the reasons each gender were looking for jobs. A significant number of females answered that they were looking for work for their well-being or SP. On the other hand, more males replied that they wanted to pay debts or were acting on the recommendations by family members. That means males participate in paid work with a more passive attitude than females and that may be why it is difficult for males to receive positive influences from paid work. Additionally, a prospective study reported that compared to voluntary retirees, older workers with good quality jobs had better health effects, but those with poor quality jobs had adverse health effects [20]. Our results regarding the relationship between paid work and IADL among females showed a significant positive association only for infrequent participation but not for frequent participation. These findings suggest that more participation in paid work by the elderly does not mean better impact on their health, and job quality may play an important role in the health of older workers.

Second, we examined the results of volunteer groups. Morrow-Howell has argued that volunteering can produce social integration, altruism, a purpose in life, and a positive emotional state, and these aspects are considered as a mechanism responsible for the beneficial effect of volunteering on health [31]. In particular, an altruistic nature is present only in volunteering and not in other social activities [32]. Additionally, he has pointed out that “volunteering is socially valued, publicly recognized, and more discretionary than working” [31]. In Japan, more adult males are assuming management and specialist positions as full-time workers than adult females [33]. It is considered that adult males gain greater societal roles and motivations in life from their work than adult females [34]. Elderly people tend to retire or even if they continue working, they work irregularly [29, 35] meaning males can no longer earn societal roles and motivation. Therefore, we consider they feel they make a valuable contribution to society through their volunteer activities [31] and that is why favorable impact on IADL from volunteer activities is shown only in male subjects.

Finally, we would like to discuss why the old-old group receives stronger favorable impact on their IADL from SPs than the young-old. Because IADL functioning involves more-multifaceted and cognitively challenging behaviors compared to BADL performance, the procedure for IADL makes not only functional mobility but also cognitive ability necessary [36]. Physical and cognitive functions diminish along with aging and it should be noted, the speed of deterioration accelerates in the old-old group [16, 37]. Elderly people’s physical activities can prevent diminishment of physical function [38] and cognitive function [39], while their mental and social activities can maintain physical function [2, 4] and cognitive function [5, 6]. Furthermore, the longer people live the higher chance they have to experience the deaths of people close and beloved to them, which may trigger deterioration of elderly people’s physical function [40]. However, it is known that social support can protect against functional deterioration caused by spousal loss [41]. SPs can increase the amount of physical activity, and give cognitive stimulation and social support that prevents functional decline during the elderly period, and we consider such impact to be greater on the old-old group than the young-old group. This study also supports the above tentative theory as our survey noted sports groups for practicing physical exercises, cultural groups for intellectually stimulating activities, and senior citizen’s clubs for exercises and brain function trainings, all of which showed a greater relationship with independent IADL for the old-old group than the young-old group.

We would like to discuss about the generalization of this study. Among this study population, 30.7% of males and 15.5% of females were engaged in paid work (see Table 3). It is reported that the year our survey was taken, 2014, the employment rate for people 65 years or older in Japan was 29.3% for males and 14.3% for females [33]. Because this study limited its subjects to those with autonomous BADL, the employment rate is pushed higher compared to all senior citizens, but we consider these numbers to somewhat show the average condition of elderly people’s employment rate. Not only for SPs including paid work, but it is important for IADL to consider neighborhood environment, for example, whether accessibilities to public transportation is good or whether SPs are held near participants’ homes [13, 23]. Therefore, it requires caution when the researchers generalize the results of this study in rural areas and metropolitan cities.

There are limitations in this study. First, because it is a cross-sectional study, we cannot identify causal correlations. It is necessary to conduct follow-up studies to confirm whether frequent SP at baseline is related to maintaining IADL. Second, the collection rate of the questionnaire is not high. In this study, we examined the differences of basic attributes between those who submitted questionnaires and those who didn’t (see Additional file 6). More people in the higher age group and those with lower physical function didn’t submit the questionnaire, which means those who are not conducting SP and those with diminished IADL can be selectively eliminated. This selection bias is considered to lead the results of the study to underestimation. Third, because both independent and dependent variables are based on self-rating, it is possible that the results are overestimated by a common method bias [42]. On the other hand, it is considered that misclassification brought by self-rating may bias the degree of influence from SP to IADL toward null value [43].

Conclusions

Although there are the limitations stated above, this study is based on complete census data from 2 local governments, and we could earn useful knowledge for the realization of a healthier aging society. The results of this study reconfirmed SP is significantly related to independent IADL among community dwelling elderly people. Additionally, it was revealed this significant relationship differs depending on the type and frequency of participation as well as gender and age group. When one recommends SP to community dwelling elderly people for the purpose of maintaining their IADL, we should suggest proper type and frequency of SP activities, taking into consideration their gender and age.

Abbreviations

BADL: 

Basic activities of daily living

IADL: 

Instrumental activities of daily living

SP: 

Social participation

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express our gratitude to all the participants for their cooperation in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by Center Administrative Expense from Nara Medical University and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K09209.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

KT provided the data collection, and the analysis and interpretation of data, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted this manuscript. NK and HH provided the concept and design of study and provided intellectual input into article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol was approved by the Nara Medical University Ethics Committee (approval number 990). All study participants provided written informed consent.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nara Prefectural Health Research Center, Nara Medical University

References

  1. World Health Organization. Active ageing: a policy framework. Geneva: WHO; 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Avlund K, Lund R, Holstein BE, Due P, Sakari-Rantala R, Heikkinen RL. The impact of structural and functional characteristics of social relations as determinants of functional decline. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004;59:S44–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ishikawa Y, Kondo N, Kondo K, Saito T, Hayashi H, Kawachi I, et al. Social participation and mortality: does social position in civic groups matter? BMC Public Health. 2016;16:394.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Kanamori S, Kai Y, Aida J, Kondo K, Kawachi I, Hirai H, et al. Social participation and the prevention of functional disability in older Japanese: the JAGES cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99638.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee SH, Kim YB. Which type of social activities may reduce cognitive decline in the elderly?: a longitudinal population-based study. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:165.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Hosoi H. Social participation and cognitive decline among community-dwelling older adults: a community-based longitudinal study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016; doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw059.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Park HK, Chun SY, Choi Y, Lee SY, Kim SJ, Park EC. Effects of social activity on health-related quality of life according to age and gender: an observational study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:140.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Takagi D, Kondo K, Kawachi I. Social participation and mental health: moderating effects of gender, social role and rurality. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:701.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kishimoto Y, Suzuki E, Iwase T, Doi H, Takao S. Group involvement and self-rated health among the Japanese elderly: an examination of bonding and bridging social capital. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1189.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health. 2001;78:458–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Musick MA, Herzog AR, House JS. Volunteering and mortality among older adults: findings from a national sample. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999;54:S173–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Apinonkul B, Soonthorndhada K, Vapattanawong P, Aekplakorn W, Jagger C. Gender differences in health expectancies across the disablement process among older Thais. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121310.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Hosoi H. Association between social participation and 3-year change in instrumental activities of daily living in community-dwelling elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:107–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Hosoi H. Association between social participation and instrumental activities of daily living among community-dwelling older adults. J Epidemiol. 2016;26:553–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Van der Vorst A, Zijlstra GA, Witte N, Duppen D, Stuck AE, Kempen GI, et al. Limitations in activities of daily living in community-dwelling people aged 75 and over: a systematic literature review of risk and protective factors. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165127.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Desrosiers J, Robichaud L, Demers L, Gélinas I, Noreau L, Durand D. Comparison and correlates of participation in older adults without disabilities. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49:397–403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffith L, Raina P, Wu H, Zhu B, Stathokostas L. Population attributable risk for functional disability associated with chronic conditions in Canadian older adults. Age Ageing. 2010;39:738–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fujiwara Y, Shinkai S, Kobayashi E, Minami U, Suzuki H, Yoshida H, et al. Engagement in paid work as a protective predictor of basic activities of daily living disability in Japanese urban and rural community-dwelling elderly residents: an 8-year prospective study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16:126–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Welsh J, Strazdins L, Charlesworth S, Kulik CT, Butterworth P. Health or harm? A cohort study of the importance of job quality in extended workforce participation by older adults. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:885.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Koyano W, Shibata H, Nakazato K, Haga H, Suyama Y. Measurement of competence: reliability and validity of the TMIG index of competence. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1991;13:103–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujiwara T, Kondo K, Shirai K, Suzuki K, Kawachi I. Associations of childhood socioeconomic status and adulthood height with functional limitations among Japanese older people: results from the JAGES 2010 project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:852–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Levasseur M, Généreux M, Bruneau JF, Vanasse A, Chabot É, Beaulac C, et al. Importance of proximity to resources, social support, transportation and neighborhood security for mobility and social participation in older adults: results from a scoping study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:503.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Hosoi H. Relationship of having hobbies and a purpose in life with mortality, Activities of daily living, and instrumental Activities of daily living among community-dwelling elderly adults. J Epidemiol. 2016;26:361–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Hosoi H. Self-rated health predicts decline in instrumental activities of daily living among high-functioning community-dwelling older people. Age Ageing. 2017;46:265–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoyl MT, Alessi CA, Harker JO, Josephson KR, Pietruszka FM, Koelfgen M, et al. Development and testing of a five-item version of the geriatric depression scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:873–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, Hawes C, Phillips C, Mor V, et al. MDS cognitive performance scale. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M174–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. White IR, Thompson SG. Adjusting for partially missing baseline measurements in randomized trials. Stat Med. 2005;24:993–1007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Minami U, Nishi M, Fukaya T, Hasebe M, Nonaka K, Koike T, et al. Effects of the change in working status on the health of older people in Japan. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0144069.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Minami U, Suzuki H, Kuraoka M, Koike T, Kobayashi E, Fujiwara Y. Older adults looking for a job through employment support system in Tokyo. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159713.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrow-Howell N. Volunteering in later life: research frontiers. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65:461–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Piliavin JA, Siegl E. Health benefits of volunteering in the Wisconsin longitudinal study. J Health Soc Behav. 2007;48:450–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. The Statistics Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Annual Report on the Labour Force Survey 2014.Google Scholar
  34. Janzen BL, Muhajarine N. Social role occupancy, gender, income adequacy, life stage and health: a longitudinal study of employed Canadian men and women. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1491–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Employment for the elderly. White paper on aging society 2014.Google Scholar
  36. Vaughan L, Giovanello K. Executive function in daily life: age-related influences of executive processes on instrumental activities of daily living. Psychol Aging. 2010;25:343–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fiest KM, Jetté N, Roberts JI, Maxwell CJ, Smith EE, Black SE, et al. The prevalence and incidence of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43:S3–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Paterson DH, Warburton DE. Physical activity and functional limitations in older adults: a systematic review related to Canada's physical activity guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Etgen T, Sander D, Huntgeburth U, Poppert H, Forstl H, Bickel H. Physical activity and incident cognitive impairment in elderly persons: the INVADE study. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:186–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Naef R, Ward R, Mahrer-Imhof R, Grande G. Characteristics of the bereavement experience of older persons after spousal loss: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:1108–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Unger JB, Johnson CA, Marks G. Functional decline in the elderly: evidence for direct and stress-buffering protective effects of social interactions and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 1997;19:152–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rothman KJ. Epidemiology: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017