A realist evaluation of the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a digital music and movement intervention for older people living in care homes

Table 5 Effect of intervention on well-being outcomes

Variables	Baseline mean	Post-intervention mean	Mean diff	95% CI	p-value	Effect size (Cohen’s d)
FES	8.17	8.72	-.556	[-4.199, 3.088]	.752	-.076
Dartmouth COOP	16.33	15.17	1.167	[-.664, 2.998]	.197	.317
HADS-Anx	6.22	4.11	2.111	[.373, 3.850]	.020*	.604
HADS-Dep	6.17	3.17	3.000	[1.303, 4.697]	.002*	.879
EQ-5D-3L	8.00	7.72	.278	[-.714, 1.270]	.562	.139
Brief UCLA loneliness scale	10.61	8.94	1.667	[.067, 3.267]	.042*	.518
PSS	14.72	10.56	4.167	[.318, 8.016]	.036*	.538
STT	27.06	33.72	-6.667	[-9.174, -4.159]	< .001*	-1.322
SNAQ4	16.39	16.22	.167	[-1.078, 1.411]	.781	.067

Note: FES Falls Efficacy Scale International (7-item), Dartmouth COOP Dartmouth Cooperative Functional Assessment Charts, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, EQ-5D-3L EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system (three level version), UCLA University of California, Los Angeles loneliness scale, PSS Perceived Stress Scale, STT National Sleep Foundation Sleep Satisfaction Tool, SNAQ4 Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire
^*marks significance p < 0.05

ISSN: 1471-2318