Table 6 Regression analysis showing the effect of the intervention on the outcomes [difference in IPOS & EQ-5D-5L scores (T1 – T0)]a
Outcome: difference in total IPOS scores (T1 – T0) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted coefficient (95% CI) | Adjusted coefficient (95% CI) | R2 | |
Group | 0.175 | ||
Control | 1 | 1 | |
Intervention | -7.06 (-9.40 : -4.73)* | -6.34 (-9.01 : -4.26)* | |
Outcome: difference in physical IPOS scores (T1 – T0) | |||
Group | 0.065 | ||
Control | 1 | 1 | |
Intervention | -1.46 (-2.80 : -0.11)* | -1.32 (-2.69 : 0.06) | |
Outcome: difference in psychological IPOS scores (T1 – T0) | |||
Group | 0.108 | ||
Control | 1 | 1 | |
Intervention | -2.63 (-3.67 : -1.59)* | -2.45 (-3.53 : -1.38)* | |
Outcome: difference in communication/practical IPOS scores (T1 – T0) | |||
Group | 0.163 | ||
Control | 1 | 1 | |
Intervention | -2.93 (-3.86 : -2.00)* | -2.81 (-3.76 : -1.85)* | |
Outcome: difference in EQ 5D index values (T1 – T0) | |||
Group | 0.050 | ||
Control | 1 | 1 | |
Intervention | 0.13 (0.06 : 0.21)* | 0.12 (0.04 : 0.19)* | |
aAdjusted for age, gender, & living status | |||