Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of identified PIMs and annual prevalence of use according to different criteria

From: Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in older population: comparison of the Finnish Meds75+ database with eight published criteria

Criteria

PIMsa identified

PIMs per person

Prevalence in 2017, %

Prevalence in 2018, %

Prevalence in 2019, %

Overlap between Meds75+ and other criteria %b

Meds75+ database (Finland)

91

1–13

33.6

32.7

30.4

Beers criteria (USA)

79

1–17

57.0

56.4

55.3

57.4

EU(7)-PIM list (Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden)

128

1–16

39.9

38.9

37.5

72.2

Indicators for Quality of Drug Therapy in the elderly (Sweden)

28

1–8

17.0

16.2

15.7

99.1

Laroche criteria (France)

38

1–7

14.2

13.1

10.7

95.2

NORGEP-NH (Norway)

29

1–11

36.0

34.9

33.7

65.3

PRISCUS list (Germany)

35

1–8

24.0

22.9

20.6

72.2

Red-Yellow-Green list (Denmark)

38

1–9

30.1

29.6

28.9

56.9

STOPP(/START) (Ireland)

65

1–17

52.1

51.7

50.8

57.9

  1. NH nursing home, NORGEP Norwegian General Practice, PIM potentially inappropriate medication, STOPP/START Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions and Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment
  2. aavailable on Finnish pharmaceutical market
  3. bproportion of persons identified as PIM users consistently by the Meds75+ database and the other criterion, compared to the total number of PIM users in 2017–2019 of the other criterion