Skip to main content

Table 4 Means, standard deviations, and mixed ANOVA statistics for primary and secondary outcomes in the per-protocol sample

From: Non-pharmacological, psychosocial MAKS-s intervention for people with severe dementia in nursing homes: results of a cluster-randomised trial

Variable

Intervention

(n = 31)

Control

(n = 60)

mixed ANOVAa

M

SD

M

SD

Effect

F ratio

df

p

Partial η2

NPI-NH

 t0

18.94

17.58

25.55

16.13

G

1.20

1

.277

.01

 t6

27.00

16.20

25.12

15.90

T

10.88

1

.001

.11

G x T

10.90

1

.001

.11

QUALIDEM

 t0

80.44

12.25

72.21

14.70

G

5.85

1

.018

.06

 t6

76.10

13.70

70.90

15.57

T

3.84

1

.053

.04

G x T

1.37

1

.244

.02

ADCS-ADL-sev

 t0

13.00

9.89

11.70

8.44

G

0.01

1

.937

.00

 t6

11.65

11.26

11.26

9.32

T

8.04

1

.006

.08

G x T

0.88

1

.350

.01

  1. Note. ANOVA Analysis of variance, G Main effect of group, T Main effect of time, G x T Interaction effect between group and time, t0 baseline data collection, t6 data collection directly after the end of the 6-month intervention period, Intervention MAKS-s intervention group, Control waitlist control group, NPI-NH Total score (frequency x severity) of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory – Nursing Home Version, higher scores indicate more pronounced behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, range: 0–144, QUALIDEM Total score for the QUALIDEM, higher scores indicate better quality of life, range: 0–100, ADCS-ADL-sev Total score for the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory – Severe Impairment Version, higher scores indicate higher capabilities in activities of daily living, range: 0–54
  2. a ANOVAs were based on scores that were transformed to normality: square root transformation for NPI-NH and ADCS-ADL-sev), quadratic transformation for QUALIDEM
  3. p-values < .05 are printed in bold; n = 91 (per-protocol)