Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the Participants

From: The willingness and influencing factors to choose smart senior care among old adults in China

Variables

Total (n = 760)

If willing to choose smart senior care

χ2

Yes

No

Demographic characteristics

 Age, %

  Ages 60–69

275 (36.2)

235 (85.5)

40, (14.5)

38.248***

  Ages 70–79

317 (41.7)

257 (81.1)

60 (18.9)

 

  Ages 80+

168 (22.1)

103 (61.3)

65 (38.7)

 

 Gender, %

  Female

389 (51.2)

301 (77.4)

88 (22.6)

0.390

  Male

371 (48.8)

294 (79.2)

77 (20.8)

 

 Registered residence, %

  Rural

443 (58.3)

332 (74.9)

111 (25.1)

6.995**

  Urban

317 (41.7)

263 (83.0)

54 (17.0)

 

 Years of education, %

  No education

133 (17.5)

89 (67.0)

44 (33.0)

24.283***

  1–6 years of education

381 (50.1)

290 (76.1)

91 (23.9)

 

  7 + years of education

246 (32.4)

216 (87.8)

30 (22.2)

 

 Pre-retirement occupation, %

  Have a formal job

339 (44.6)

278 (82.0)

61 (18.0)

4.973*

  Others

421 (55.4)

317 (75.3)

104 (24.7)

 

Security factors

 National health insurance enrollment, %

  UEMS

256 (33.7)

215 (84.0)

41 (16.0)

9.197*

  URMS

183 (24.1)

144 (78.7)

39 (21.3)

 

  NRCMS

321 (42.2)

236 (73.5)

85 (26.5)

 

 Monthly income in RMB, %

  Less than 1000

163 (21.4)

121 (74.2)

42 (25.8)

11.350*

  1000-1999

150 (19.7)

109 (72.7)

41 (27.3)

 

  2000-2999

229 (30.1)

179 (78.2)

50 (21.8)

 

  3000-3999

132 (17.4)

115 (87.1)

17 (12.9)

 

  More than 4000

86 (11.3)

71 (82.6)

15 (17.4)

 

 Live with a spouse, %

  Yes

605 (79.6)

475 (78.5)

130 (21.5)

0.087

  No

155 (20.4)

120 (77.4)

35 (22.6)

 

 Number of children, %

  Only child

192 (25.3)

178 (92.7)

14 (7.3)

43.073***

  Two children

278 (36.6)

214 (77.0)

64 (23.0)

 

  Three children

162 (21.3)

123 (76.0)

39 (24.0)

 

  Four or more children

128 (16.8)

80 (62.5)

48 (37.5)

 

 Frequency of children visiting parents, %

  Everyday

258 (33.9)

180 (69.8)

78 (30.2)

25.384***

  Weekly

242 (31.8)

192 (79.3)

50 (20.7)

 

  Semimonthly

107 (14.1)

84 (78.5)

23 (21.5)

 

  Monthly+

153 (20.2)

139 (90.8)

14 (9.2)

 

 Primary caregiver, %

  Spouse

276 (36.3)

227 (82.2)

49 (17.8)

4.632

  Children

219 (28.8)

164 (74.9)

55 (25.1)

 

  Oneself

243 (32.0)

186 (76.5)

57 (23.5)

 

  Others

22 (2.9)

18 (81.8)

4 (18.2)

 

 Perceived adequacy of senior care received, %

  Yes

263 (34.6)

185 (70.3)

78 (29.7)

14.944***

  No

497 (65.4)

410 (82.5)

87 (17.5)

 

Health factors

 Self-reported health, %

  Well

459 (60.4)

340 (74.1)

119 (25.9)

12.116***

  Worse

301 (39.6)

255 (84.7)

46 (15.3)

 

 Any IADL disability, %

  Yes

492 (64.7)

393 (79.9)

99 (20.1)

2.072

  No

268 (35.3)

202 (75.4)

66 (24.6)

 

 Hospitalization within a year, %

  Yes

231 (30.4)

194 (84.0)

37 (16.0)

6.329*

  No

529 (69.6)

401 (75.8)

128 (24.2)

 

 Any chronic diseases, %

  Yes

426 (56.1)

350 (82.2)

76 (17.8)

8.542**

  No

334 (43.9)

245 (73.3)

89 (26.7)

 

 Frequency of physical examination, %

  Half a year

157 (20.7)

125 (79.6)

32 (20.4)

19.977***

  Annually

325 (42.8)

270 (83.1)

55 (16.9)

 

  Biennial

129 (17.0)

103 (79.8)

26 (20.2)

 

  More than 2 years

149 (19.6)

97 (65.1)

52 (34.9)

 

Participation factors

 Smartphone use, %

  Yes

441 (58.0)

371 (84.1)

70 (15.9)

21.064***

  No

319 (42.0)

224 (70.2)

95 (29.8)

 

 Familiarity with smart senior care, %

  Know very well

48 (6.3)

41 (85.4)

7 (14.6)

6.453*

  Just heard of

227 (29.9)

188 (82.8)

39 (17.2)

 

  Incomprehension

485 (63.8)

366 (75.5)

119 (24.5)

 

 Attitude towards smart senior care, %

  Supportive

686 (90.3)

573 (83.5)

113 (16.5)

113.737***

  Not supportive

74 (9.7)

22 (29.7)

52 (70.3)

 
  1. *** p < 0.001, ** 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01, * 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05